Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 153
Jul. 9th, 2024 10:10 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ecosophia
We are now winding up the third year of these open posts. As the phrase "died suddenly" repeats in the mass media like a mantra, statistics for work days lost to illness and all-cause mortality mount up in heavily vaccinated nations, and more and more ugly facts about the official response to Covid spill out into public, we are entering what may well turn out to be the most difficult period of the Covid disaster -- the phase in which denial rises in lockstep with the death rate, and a great many people try not to admit what has been done to them by the people and institutions they trusted. It could get ugly, folks. So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:
1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.
2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue.
4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.
With that said, the floor is open for discussion.
COVID and Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory
Date: 2024-07-13 04:00 am (UTC)Those with sharp memories may recall that when the PCR test kicked off, the CDC did NOT provide a specific sample of the COVID virus to calibrate the PCR machines with, rather a so-called "generic coronavirus". Notwithstanding that, the PCR test is fraudulent, as detection of a 'virus' is determined by the cycle count used. Want to find a virus, then just dial up the cycle count, as they did in early COVID days.
Some people may have heard about "terrain theory" as a counter to germ theory. Terrain theory asserts that a person's health determines whether they 'catch' a disease, NOT the presence of 'germs'. Terrain theory was the dominant medical model until roughly the mid-1800s.
The more I read about the origins of the allopathic medical system, the more I become suspicious of its overall motives. Most people on this forum now understand that profit and control are its primary objectives, not people's health.
Anyway, this is a podcast on terrain theory vs germ theory with Andrew Kaufman and Daniel Roytas that you may find useful: https://rumble.com/v551340-july-2-2024.html
I found the arguments and data presented to be credible. Then again, I'm someone who in my own way, has come to live according to terrain theory, as it works for me and is fear and BS free.
Re: COVID and Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory
Date: 2024-07-13 03:17 pm (UTC)Re: COVID and Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory
Date: 2024-07-13 05:03 pm (UTC)Re: COVID and Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory
Date: 2024-07-14 05:05 pm (UTC)I just happened to buy Daniel Roytas's book "Can you catch a cold?" this past week, and I look forward to reading it. I have been following Andrew Kaufman and Dr. Tom Cowan for a few years and they (and a few others) have convinced me that viruses don't exist. I am still looking to figure out the phenomenon of what people call contagion, and hopefully Roytas covers some of that in his book. Dr. Cowan once made an argument that similar to how trees can alert one another when toxins or other dangers are in the environment so they can activate their defense mechanisms, humans may be a able to do something similar, which results in people "catching colds" from one another, which trigger our cleansing mechanisms (coughing, sneezing, fevers, etc.).
Dr. Cowan was recently on Kim Iversen's show where he spoke about how viruses don't exist, for those who may be interested. I felt a little sorry for Kim Iversen, because unless you have given this issue some thought, it is hard to unwrap yourself from the existing "virus paradigm" way of thinking about things.
https://rumble.com/v568k86-title-do-viruses-even-exist-this-doctor-says-he-can-prove-that-they-dont..html
Re: COVID and Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory
Date: 2024-07-14 08:27 pm (UTC)