Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 66

[ecosophia]

As we proceed through the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselesness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries. 

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religious, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.     

Comments

Everybody should read this one

[(Anonymous)]

This might be the best explanation for why so many authorities are overlooking a higher number of adverse effects from these vaccines than what would be normally accepted. The DoD and National Security apparatus want a fast-moving platform for bioweapon defence. As the ability to manufacture synthetic viruses becomes more widely available, an enormous risk is that it will be used by a bad actor. Having the ability to defend against such an attack is considered paramount. The mRNA platforms provide this, however imperfectly.

Re: Everybody should read this one

[(Anonymous)]

Bad actor? Defend against a bad actor? Who might the 'bad actor' be? And what determines the 'good' actor to be 'good?'

Re: Everybody should read this one

[(Anonymous)]

Not getting into a philosophical debate on good and bad actors.

But, yes, this technology will become more and more accessible until even a knowledgeable university student with access to the right lab might be able to make a deadly virus, let alone potentially terrorist groups and the like. Normally, nations wouldn't do this because you could release something that hurts your own population as much as your enemy's, but if this technology gets advanced enough that you can target specific ethnicities, that might change.

The powers that be see this as a gigantic threat and wish to defend against such a possibility.

Re: Everybody should read this one

[(Anonymous)]

so they might like for us to think.

Re: Everybody should read this one

[scotlyn]

Why assume the entities in question want their "fast-moving platform" for bioweapon DEfence? Is it not just as likely that they want it for bioweapon OFfence?

Is the actor that is doing the "overlooking" not already acting exactly as badly as the "bad actor" that we can all imagine taking advantage of their techniques, methods and discoveries?