Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 6

[ecosophia]

The semi-open posts  I've hosted here on the Covid-19 narrative, the inadequately tested experimental drugs for it, and the whole cascading mess surrounding them have continued to field a gargantuan (and increasing) number of comments, so I'm opening another space for discussion. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 

3. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, the floor is open for discussion. 

Comments

Re: How you get pandemic of unvaccinated and don't have to count vaccine injuries

[(Anonymous)]

I don't know whether someone with more biochemistry than me could clarify this.

I have wondered whether the virus could evolve to be able to use the spike protein subunits that are supposed to be made by the body as a result of the jab.

Then you would see the newly vaccinated absolutely getting swamped by the disease all of a sudden because the virus would have half of its work already done -- after all a virus is basically a molecular machine that is trying to make more of itself. If the body is already making half the proteins it needs, a strain that can cash in on that would have an evolutionary advantage in the newly vaccinated.

Re: How you get pandemic of unvaccinated and don't have to count vaccine injuries

[(Anonymous)]

I wouldn't expect much if any effect here. New viruses are only produced in infected cells, and the number of new viruses that can be produced is limited by the least abundant component. So a surplus of spikes will not necessarily lead to a surplus of viruses.

As to whether the vaccine spike could be incorporated into the virus if infection and vaccination overlapped, that's a good question to which I don't have an answer.

Mark L