Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 6

[ecosophia]

The semi-open posts  I've hosted here on the Covid-19 narrative, the inadequately tested experimental drugs for it, and the whole cascading mess surrounding them have continued to field a gargantuan (and increasing) number of comments, so I'm opening another space for discussion. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 

3. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, the floor is open for discussion. 

Comments

[emilyknapstad]

You should look at this

https://m.facebook.com/110047718058030/posts/117910867271715/?d=n

Some news agency went phishing for covid deaths stories they got death stories alright but vaccine related ones . They got ripped to shreds . Thousands of comments by people whose family members either died or ended up crippled so far its mostly middle aged and old people . But they are pushing vaccines to teens and children 12 and older and planning to approve for seven and older . I think we are at combination of both 10th and 11th stage . I am waiting for some poor kid to die and angry mother to rant on TikTok/ social media to set the powder keg off..

[(Anonymous)]

Starfish corn, anyone?

(It's a reference to a plot device in Retrotopia: the civil war which destroyed the US was set off by an angry mob tearing a GMO company executive apart when he stood up to say that their corn, which had a gene from a starfish spliced into it, couldn't possibly be causing the wave of birth defects which were occurring.)

[escorcher]

We're still just mostly getting the (now) regular drip drip drip of 'save the vaccine hesitant' stories: e.g. this today from The Grauniad:
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/sep/14/the-virus-is-painfully-real-vaccine-hesitant-people-are-dying-and-their-loved-ones-want-the-world-to-listen

[(Anonymous)]

I saw that, too. Nowhere did it touch on statistics about how many people in the age groups it mentions actually die of Covid. Versus, say, car accidents.

[(Anonymous)]

its cherry picked story with no open comments, go to any place where the comments are open and barely moderated like facebook or twitter they get ripped to shreds this was the most obvious example something like 100 000 comments on that place people basically tarring and feathering the news organization for trying to to cherry pick a story while ignoring the bigger story ie vaccine injuries .