Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 191

[ecosophia]

We are now in the fourth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary more than three years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health are anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.

5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.

With that said, the floor is open for discussion. 

Comments

Re: A Few Questions about Cancer from the Vaccine

[(Anonymous)]

I've mostly run across observations from individual doctors. Particularly concerning are new, unusually aggressive cancers in people much younger than the typical age for a given kind of cancer. That's hugely important, and would not be easy to see from aggregate totals. See, for instance this piece, about Dr. Angus Dalgleish:

https://www.sgtreport.com/2022/12/uk-oncologist-reveals-cancer-cases-have-increased-in-those-vaccinated-for-covid-19/

That article contains a link to a Harvard study that deals with rising cancers in young people. (But it employs the usual statistical skullduggery-- blaming alcohol and sleep deprivation and ignoring the giant elephant in the room, and looking at a 30 year period rather than the past four years.)

Or read the transcript of the recent Tucker Carlson podcast with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong. Several disturbing anecdotes about aggressive cancers in very young people:

https://singjupost.com/transcript-of-dr-patrick-soon-shiong-on-the-tucker-carlson-show/?singlepage=1

*Ochre Harebrained Curmudgeon*

Re: A Few Questions about Cancer from the Vaccine

[(Anonymous)]

Interesting, so Dr. Soon-Shiong thinks the mechanism that causes cancer is inflammation from the spike protein. Early in the vaccine roll-out, before the great internet purge began, I remember reading about how MRNA caused cancer in animal testing, which was the reason it was not really allowed until they were able to get the EUA due to Covid. If I remember correctly, it was all (or at least a significant enough number of) MRNA vaccines, not just ones with spike proteins.

Maybe I'm remembering incorrectly, and I can't really find any articles from "reputable sources" because the internet has been thoroughly scrubbed in the last 3 years. All I can find when I type in "why weren't MRNA vaccines used before Covid?" are misleading articles about how MRNA wasn't used because it "wasn't effective yet" or had "unknown side effects". The unknown side effects prior to 2021 makes me laugh because how could the "long term side effects" go from "unknown" to "known" within the course of like 1 year?

Re: A Few Questions about Cancer from the Vaccine

[stubborn_ass]

Recently I pinged another poster with these snippets of info, which I think is relevant to the concerns you raised in your post:

I was catching up on a recent Garland Nixon podcast and only just learnt about this ... retired NBA all-star Dwayne Wade (Miami Heat) revealed his kidney cancer only recently... he got it when only 40 years old. Garland did a quick search on 'dwayne wade and covid vex' when the 'news' first got reported in early March, and lo and behold, lots of results popped up showing that Wade had been a huge endorser of the jabs. He appeared in Pfizer ads telling people to jab up, so for sure he took some of their money. Blood money it turns out. He has no family history of liver cancer.. he's way too young and living healthy as he still has significant wealth.. so liver cancer?

Now 2 weeks later, when Garland does the same exact internet search - google has memory-holed all those previous covid ads which Wade was involved in... and you get a whole bunch of misdirection links and info instead. So yah, people need to take screenshots of what they've been systematically searching for, as it does get scrubbed quickly when the public starts asking questions.

Anyways, while still on the subject of the NBA.. (I've also mentioned this in a previous week's post) Garland also noted the 2 NBA all-star players who had to stop playing this season due to 'deep vein thrombosis'.. aka clots. That pretty much never happened before the shots, and we seem to be getting 1 to 2 instances each year now, with this year being significant as it is 2 players at the all-star level. I've mentioned this before - one of the keys to being a truly elite athlete is possessing a recovery system that is insanely off the charts fast. To be an NBA all-star for multiple years, or having a decade + career at the top flight like Damian Lillard implies an even more superlative recovery system - yet he got the blood clots which his body couldn't clear fast enough.

I knew that Lebron James's son Bronny who is on the Lakers team with him now... had a heart attack while playing at his prep school (a funnel for future NBA players). Garland mentioned that actually 2 !!! guys on that team suffered heart attacks on the team that year...

The other NBA player is very young, only early 20's (french national player). NBA was fanatical about jabbing... the ones who resisted where shamed and tarred in the media. Personally I lost a lot of interest in the NBA when too many of the all-stars just meekly went along and told their lesser teammates to jab up - coz they had multi-million contracts to play and wanted the game to resume.

Re: A Few Questions about Cancer from the Vaccine

[(Anonymous)]

I haven't read the study, but any study that wants to be taken seriously has to look at a period of more than four years, especially when the first of those years had plummeting cancer "incidence" due to lack of access to medical care. The purpose of doing science is not (or should not be) to preach to the choir, but to influence those who are sitting on the fence.