Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 139
Apr. 2nd, 2024 09:38 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:
1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.
2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue.
4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.
With that said, the floor is open for discussion.
Re: Ivermectin scare
Date: 2024-04-03 11:49 am (UTC)Re: Ivermectin scare
Date: 2024-04-03 04:59 pm (UTC)Unless they are referring to another anti-viral but the link above is extremely clear on what is being indicated.
Re: Ivermectin scare
Date: 2024-04-04 10:08 pm (UTC)Re: Ivermectin scare
Date: 2024-04-05 06:35 am (UTC)1. The 'heavy' presence that was omni-present till about early 2022, coincided with the scientific censor dam being broken at that time. Prior to that we only had trickle of studies, hard to find info about effective treatments etc. The veil was lifted, and the real scientific studies eventually became a flood, providing us with a better picture of what was happening.
2. The vexed folks saying that they seem ok and each infection seems milder than the last. Once someone has taken 3 shots, at least 1 would have been a real shot, so after that the clock starts ticking. The fact that they don't mention anything about doing detox protocols with a few adamant that people around them are also fine, means that their immune system hasn't been as trashed as most vexed folks, but the IgG4 switch has happened - hence the 'milder' symptoms. In contrast, in my mostly unvexed family, we actually still have 2 coof virgins... and everyone else only got it once, with the folks who did more aggressive anti-viral treatment upon symptoms ony testing positive for 2 days. No one got it again and again. The 'milder' symptoms mean that the body is tolerating the virus and not starting any inflammatory response, thus allowing it to do more damage in the body. Again, tons of studies showing this is the case from many countries now, but hey, you can lead a horse to water and all that.
3. One thing we knew from the beginning was that VIM has been in use for decades, and was actually safe and effective, even at really ridiculously high doses. Bill Gates/Oxford/Wellcome funded the VIM study, which they finally stopped after 2 years and said they couldn't continue as they couldn't source enough VIM. You can bet by that time, they were probably feeding patients just huge amounts of VIM for breakfast, lunch and dinner, and no one had died yet. And who knows what other issues get cured by such insane dosing. They did the same thing with HCQ early on and found an 'unsafe' dosage, which we knew from long-term usage history anyways. But they couldn't pull the same stunt with VIM. So from the beginning, I understood that if any country was serious about getting the coof under control, they would need to just give VIM prophylactically to everyone for a few months and the whole situation would become a nothing-burger. If they actively demonized it as in most western-aligned countries, then the doom-cycle die is cast. We had the obvious evidence from the various Indian states, where some pushed for it's use while others didn't. Recently Vejon Health on youtube posted an update about Papua New Guinea... poor country where the hospital system was actively against using VIM, the vex rate is between 2-4% at any time.. .and all through the 'pandemic' years, the total mortality kept dropping. Yes, it really kept going down, as VIM was in widespread use for the tropical diseases that are present, so the fearmongering about VIM had zero traction has folks had long-term experience and usage of it with no issues. That is quite a staggering data point, as we see mortality going up in all the places that got more vexed than PNG, year by year.