Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 94

[ecosophia]

As we proceed through the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselessness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries. 

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Comments

Dutch neurologist Jan Hommel

[boccaccio]

Dutch neurologist Jan Hommel made an important tweet that summarizes the results that pathologist prof Burkhardt had so far with many autopsies. The tweet is here https://twitter.com/john_bumblebee/status/1662801544641642498 He has been sceptical and outspoken right since the beginning of the pandemic and sometimes he uses hash words in his tweets (that I won't repeat here). But he is well read and very clear about all kinds of medical practices and studies. This is the tweet translated in English:

Pathologist Prof. dr. Burkhardt: Langzeiteffekte der Corona-Impfung https://youtu.be/6hx1YyphJew via jessicaosgh

For several months I have been watching with great interest the ever-growing literature on the long-term side effects of the #mRNAvaccins .

I'm not shouting it from the rooftops: there's no point. The vaccines are in there and can't be taken out, as I wrote in my first blog about the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine.

Anyone who decided to take part in this mass experiment could not get out. Something few people were aware of. And I really feel sorry for the people who in their naivete thought that the government and #BigPharma had their best interests at heart.

Time will tell how serious it gets. And I'm sure it will get serious. Why I think that will become clear later on.

Professor Burkhardt gives a much longer much more in-depth lecture on the side effects here. Again, what he reports here is no different from a normal hospital pathology discussion. Many of which I have experienced.

This man has been a professor of pathology for over forty years, and knows what he is talking about.

I'll summarize for the people who don't speak German.

1. To date, Burkhardt's team has completed 75 autopsies. That is to say: with laboratory determinations and histological preparations that can be viewed under the microscope.

2. To date, the team has obtained 50 tissue preparations from biopsy or surgery. That number is rising rapidly. In the majority of cases, the question is whether the spike protein of the vaccines is detectable.

2. The longest period between vaccination and death as a result is now 580 days. In 58 of the 75 postmortems, vaccination was a major, if not the major, contributor to death.

Pathologists are cautious in their statements, because several underlying diseases can contribute to death, especially in old age, as Burkhardt rightly states.

3. 68 of these people had initially been diagnosed with a 'natural cause of death' or an 'unclear cause of death'. It is important to realize that these causes of death were determined by court pathologists. They do take blood samples and examine the contents of the stomach, for example, but very rarely have microscopic preparations made. This explains this large discrepancy, because to rule out vaccination as a cause, microscopic preparations are absolutely indispensable.

4. Of these 75 people, 60 had died acutely. Of course, a fancy name has been found for this that has been mentioned since the vaccination, and never before: Sudden Adult Death Syndrome. In plain English: they just dropped dead.

This is definitely an advantage for the pathologist, because it means that no tissue changes occur as a result of the treatment itself, with the exception of resuscitation.

5. Burkhardt once again points out the different routes that the virus and the vaccine take: the virus enters through the mucous membranes, which contain an extensive first line of defense that renders many virus particles harmless even before they can enter the body. That is not the case with the vaccine. This can distribute freely in the body until it enters the cells of the various organs and only becomes recognizable to the immune system after expression of the spike protein.

Burkhardt shows that the spike protein can be found in almost all organs that permeate blood, including organs to which the immune system has limited access, such as the testes, ovaries, brain and thymus. This is no longer news, but has also been shown in various case reports and small patient series. Some organs have no or only limited ability to repair themselves when damaged, such as the heart muscle and also the brain.

6. Of course, in the various organs, the most abundant expression of spike protein is found in the small blood vessels. That makes sense: the blood flows very slowly in those blood vessels, so that the nanoparticles can easily penetrate the cells. The first cell they encounter is the endothelial cell: the inner lining of the blood vessel. This is where the highest expression of spike protein is seen.

I want to remind you of the study that shows that the risk of a thrombosis of the draining blood vessel in the eye is about twice as high in the months after vaccination. You don't have to be a genius to realize that if this is the case in this blood vessel, it will be the case in other similar vessels as well. The only difference is that the thrombosis of this blood vessel in the eye becomes immediately apparent: you lose your sight in that eye.

Incidentally, Burkhardt shows that not only spike protein is expressed on these endothelial cells, but that the result is that these blood vessels are actually completely destroyed by the immune system.

7. As a neurologist, what I find a particularly fascinating case is the case of a 63-year-old woman suspected of having cerebral lymphoma in the brain. That is a very difficult diagnosis, which I myself have only seen three times in 20 years and made one myself. People often deteriorate quickly, both motorically and cognitively. The treatment with aggressive chemotherapy is difficult and so one must be sure of the diagnosis, which is reason to take a brain biopsy.

A brain biopsy is therefore taken from this patient one year after the last vaccination (1x Moderna, 1x Pfizer). Stains on the microscopic preparations show that spike protein is found in both brain cells and endothelial cells. It was striking that in the first pathology report it was clearly stated that there was no lymphoma, but the possible connection with vaccination was not mentioned.

8. I have already written something about the role of the elastic fibers in blood vessels and the skin. These provide elasticity of the blood vessels, so that blood pressure fluctuations caused by the heartbeat can be properly absorbed.

When blood vessels such as coronary arteries or the large body artery become inflamed due to certain pathogens (syphilis) or autoimmune diseases, the elastic fibers are damaged. That damage is not repaired, and in the following years there is a high risk of the development of aneurysms and dissections of those blood vessels.

Burkhardt is now saying out loud here what I also wrote in my previous summary: if this happens to young people after vaccination, those young people may have back or stomach pain for a few days, some non-specific complaints and simply feel unwell for a few days. But the damage that occurs to the large artery of the body is not recognized. And so it is quite possible that this will not be expressed until 5, 10 or 15 years from now by the formation of a (ruptured) aneurysm or a dissection of the large body artery. Disorders with a high mortality rate. And in those cases, it remains to be seen whether the relationship with the vaccination is still established.

To sum up: I have no doubt that there will be serious long-term consequences of the #mRNAvaccins vaccination, and it is also certain that it will lead to death in a number of cases. The only thing I don't know is how many people it will involve.

But what I dare to say is that there is a considerable underestimation of the number of people who die from the (long-term) consequences of vaccination. That is also why I am convinced that at least part of the excess mortality is the result of vaccination.

A study with 75 autopsies is a rarity in the medical literature. The publication of this data will follow sooner or later. What also appears from this presentation, and as also appeared from the German study from Heidelberg on heart muscle inflammation, vaccination is not thought to be the cause of a large proportion of people who die suddenly. Those people disappear into the oven or underground without ever establishing that relationship.

Don't let my summary stop you from watching the lecture yourself. Because it is fascinating and very worthwhile. Perhaps there is a possibility to translate it into English or Dutch. I haven't found that option, but maybe other people can.

Again, I sincerely feel sorry for the people who relied on the government and BigPharma, not realizing they were participating in a massive experiment they couldn't get out of.

(...)

We'll see how bad it gets in the years to come. I'll watch.

The discussion underneath the tweet is interesting too. Two things stood out for me.

First, there is a link to this article on Brownstone (https://brownstone.org/articles/vax-gene-files-accidental-discovery/) about the fact that some vaccines contain an amazing amount of DNA, 1000x above spec, and that the DNA is capable of transforming bacterial cells. This could be another link between the vaxx and cancer (We've also discussed here that the vax can impair the DNA-repair mechanism).

I was stunned when I read elswhere in the thread this interaction What surprises me Jan…I see old people walking around 'fit' with about 5 injections in their body and young people who have suffered damage after 1 injection. It continues to amaze me. Would the vaccines differ in content? eg placebos have been given?
Jan: No. I think, but that is only a hypothesis, that in older people the vaccine is much less distributed throughout the body and in a certain number of cases ended up in fatty tissue, so that it was not or hardly absorbed into the bloodstream. That might be a cause.
Earlier this week I noted that in Europe there is a high excess mortality in people below 45, while only a slight excess mortality in older people. This could be the explanation.