Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 29

[ecosophia]

The semi-open posts  I've hosted here on the Covid-19 narrative, the inadequately tested experimental drugs for it, and the whole cascading mess surrounding them have continued to field a very high number of comments -- to understate the matter considerably! -- so I'm opening yet another space for discussion. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, as Canadian officials launch a campaign of reprisals against citizens who supported a peaceful protest against government policy, and the words "died suddenly" become the favorite media euphemism of our time, the floor is open for discussion.   

Comments

Re: Interesting article -- will Life Insurance companies and Wall Street end it?

[(Anonymous)]

I have read this article and others about Edward Dowd, a former Blackrock employee who is saying 1) The vaccines are killing lots people, 2) The group life insurance companies will refuse to pay out for deaths caused by the vaccine, 3) Big Pharma has no liability (that is what the EUAs are about) UNLESS they committed fraud, in which case, they are liable and will be sued into bankruptcy, 4) All of this is beginning to dawn on Wall Street and they are pretty sure there is plenty of fraud, so they are selling off Big Pharma, or at least hedging, and maybe shorting it.

My question for the commentariat is this: Do you know anyone who was killed by the vaccine, i.e., they died and there was a report put into VAERS (or other system if outside the US)? If so, do you know if the survivors got a payout from the life insurance? There was a story making the rounds that a life insurance company in France refused to pay out in such a case, but no one can verify it. Anyone out there know of any examples where a life insurance company paid?

Re: Interesting article -- will Life Insurance companies and Wall Street end it?

[(Anonymous)]

a few weeks ago i bookmarked a page that discussed the french insurance company and another one that i think was us based. i would provide the link, but, sadly, the site can't be reached.

from what i remember, one company used something along the lines of "you took a risk that violates the contract" and the other said that you, by taking the risk, which if you'd done your due diligence, means you "effectively committed suicide," which the policy doesn't cover.

i got excited about this dowd business yesterday. keep in mind that the pharma companies, the insurance companies, and everyone else involved are mostly owned by entities like blackrock and vanguard. the big funds own a big part of everything traded on an exchange. it looks to me like the major players are looking to scapegoat pharma, so they can cut some losses and take control of the companies that take the hit.

as someone pointed out, the physical assets still exist. the shareholders of these companies will be wiped out in a bankruptcy. think pension funds and 401k account holders that own shares. the creditors become the new shareholders. and who are the creditors? the big banks that lend money to these corporations.

as always, follow the money.

- p coyle

Re: Interesting article -- will Life Insurance companies and Wall Street end it?

[(Anonymous)]

freewestmedia.com/2022/01/14/life-insurer-refuses-to-cover-vaccine-death/

Re: Interesting article -- will Life Insurance companies and Wall Street end it?

[hearthspirit]

Buried the lede on that one a bit, didn't they?

"This case has not yet been reported in France's mainstream media. The case was published by the family’s lawyer, Carlo Alberto Brusa, on social media. Unfortunately, no sources or court records are given, which is why the authenticity of the report cannot currently be verified although there have been other warnings regarding the risk associated with the jabs recognized by insurers. In the US, the American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI) has denied reports of non-payment."