Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 4
Aug. 31st, 2021 01:43 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ecosophia
The semi-open posts I've hosted here on the Covid-19 narrative, the inadequately tested experimental drugs for it, and the whole cascading mess surrounding them have continued to field a huge number of comments, so I'm opening another space for discussion. The rules are the same as before: 1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.
2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.
3. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.
With that said, the floor is open for discussion.
Re: NonEntity
Date: 2021-09-06 12:00 am (UTC)I have seen (and had before) that you put this forward as merely speculation, and yet without putting forth conditions for falsification I am concerned that others who might hold you in high esteem are ready to run with it. "Unpleasant neighbor/family member/dog must be under sway as I, despite not living in their minds, cannot fathom their actions and reactions."
Criterium for falsification could greatly control such hysteria, but your post included no such controls, and as such may be mentally and psychically dangerous.
Furthermore, I personally do not grasp the necessity of including demonic influence if they are just working through human foibles. It looks superfluous at best, and risky at worst. Does discerning the presence of an overarching demonic influence serve any purpose at all, that could be worth entrenching the us-v-them narrative? What aspects of the insanity cannot be explained in the material sphere?
For anyone else who'd like to free up some more time for thought, I heard Antony Flew and John Frame know some gardeners...
Addie Ilios
PS: To answer another poster, no, I am not sympathetic to the opening argument as presented; however I have had -zero- interaction with MR or daemonolatry and am barely stumbling through searches at the moment. Mr. Greer indicated he had many notes, and when the full research is presented I am eager to look over and cross reference and reconsider in light of new evidence.
Re: NonEntity
Date: 2021-09-06 10:35 pm (UTC)With a situation this bad, what difference does it make if occultists are looking for evidence and testing hypotheses of corresponding phenomena on the invisible realms? It's not like there is a wizard militia ready to deploy around the world with magic wands and kalashnikovs on a zombie/demon slaying inquisition.
If anything the message here is and has always been "collapse now and avoid the rush"