Re: trust in institutional science

Date: 2021-05-22 12:07 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
This reminds me about the controversy about GMOs, for instance (I hope this isn't off-topic, as it is a hotly debated topic and concerns the very prestige of institutional science itself). Even if one were to take a neutral perspective (which I personally don't) and try avoiding taking the side of either the pro-GMO or the anti-GMO side, I believe a strong case can be made about exercising extreme caution regarding these. I mean, we have not more than 50 plant genomes in total mapped and sequenced, but not even one of them is properly understood, i.e. there is a glaring lack of mechanistic models to explain the interactions of the genes of the tomato plant, for example. Given that the genome of any organism is a complex, nonlinear and self-regulating system, should we not take extreme precaution before we try to play around with it, much more than we would when trying to play around with the design of a pump, for example? At the very least, one could do worse than to make an informed decision regarding the same. Unfortunately, the officially approved people simply don't care...
(will be screened)
(will be screened)
(will be screened)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 11:23 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios