The Triumph of the Retro (print version)
Feb. 16th, 2018 10:04 pm
I was delighted to read in a news story today that one of the more loudly ballyhooed waves of the future has definitely broken and is now rolling back out to sea. E-books, heavily marketed not that many years ago as the inevitable next step in the glorious march of progress that was guaranteed to sweep all before it, peaked three years ago with about 20% of the book market. Since then it's slid back down to about 15%. Those numbers are a solid confirmation of something I've been hearing for a while now. Lots of people just plain enjoy books as physical objects, and lots more prefer the experience of reading printer's ink on paper to the experience of reading pixels on a little glass screen. I've heard of several people who got rid of their entire library of printed books in their initial enthusiasm for e-books, only to turn around six months or a year later and start buying the books back again, because once the rush wore off, they missed their books.
I don't expect e-books to go away forever any time soon -- they'll drop out of use as the technological infrastructure needed to build and use them comes apart, but that's still a ways in the future -- but the old-fashioned book still has plenty of life left in it. I'm particularly pleased to see some small presses concentrating on making books that are a physical pleasure to hold and read -- books that are well designed, gorgeously illustrated, and attractively bound. (Like, ahem, my newly released translation of Giordano Bruno's major handbook on the art of memory, On the Shadows of the Ideas, just out from Miskatonic Press: drop-dead gorgeous doesn't half cover it.)
In the meantime, I'm going to sit down with an old book and gloat a bit...
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-17 04:17 am (UTC)Anyways, have any occult groups or lodges attempted to create multi-person memory palaces, or attempted binding one to a talisman as off-site backup storage?
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-18 02:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-17 04:34 am (UTC)Anyway I hate ebooks. Reading off a screen is uncomfortable for long periods of time, and corporations try to lock you into their specific proprietary device and format and prevent you from actually owning the damn book you already paid for. Books are just so much simpler.
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-18 02:14 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-17 05:55 am (UTC)Feel lucky to have it.
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-18 02:16 am (UTC)Unsurprising
Date: 2018-02-17 09:28 am (UTC)Anyway, I have settled somewhere a little more permanently now and can risk building a real book collection again. Second hand book shops are so cheap, three bookshelves are already full, can I fit another somewhere? :-)
Damo
Re: Unsurprising
Date: 2018-02-18 02:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-17 10:09 am (UTC)On Giordano Bruno: I wonder, apart from translating it, how much use you have made of his system?
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-18 02:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-17 11:31 am (UTC)The 'e-ink' screen is so much like reading paper that my eyes are 95% as comfortable as with a real book. (Have you tried one?) When I want to read in bed and not wake my wife, the very gentle light in the front face of the screen (turned down as dim as it will go) is great. So they are certainly a useful device at times. I tend to use the e-book in bed and real books the rest of the time. (This is from someone who works in I.T. and does not have a smartphone).
I'm not at all surprised, though, that we've passed 'Peak E-book'. :-)
I pre-ordered your translation of Giordano Bruno, and was informed a few days ago that it's on its way to me in Australia. I'm eager to handle it. Thank you! :-)
Matt
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-17 03:36 pm (UTC)Every department store and major train station will have a sizeable bookshop too. It is reassuring to see how thriving their book culture remains even when everyone and their dog owns a mobile phone.
-Jeffrey
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-18 02:24 am (UTC)Hurry up, USPS!
Date: 2018-02-17 05:08 pm (UTC)Re: Hurry up, USPS!
Date: 2018-02-18 02:25 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-17 06:34 pm (UTC)Besides, in the context of the decline and fall of Western civilization it has occurred to me a while ago, that instead of being replaced through e-books, books in the traditional sense will probably have a long future ahead of them. In the last 5000 years, books assumed many forms with many materials and many writing systems, out of which they were made, and the same will apply to the future. Due to printing, there will in future non-industrial civilizations be even more books than in non-industrial past civilizations.
From Booklover
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-18 02:28 am (UTC)Is reading an E-book ever really private?
Date: 2018-02-17 07:04 pm (UTC)Ever since a copyright dispute disabled an e-book version of "1984", we've known that we can never really own an e-book. We're just borrowing it.
de Lathechuck
Re: Is reading an E-book ever really private?
Date: 2018-02-18 02:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-17 07:19 pm (UTC)One sales person, working in a store very, very close to the largest university in Washington State, explained they were "readers, not research machines." I countered by pointing up the hill and saying it was comforting that no one "up there" at the university needed a device that could easily excerpt content!
For that reason alone, I never made the plunge, but instead read, note place in book, and type like a fiend to create my own file of text. It's a pain. A well-designed reading machine that can create text files for export would save me a bunch of time, especially on older, public domain titles.
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-18 02:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-19 03:46 pm (UTC)As for ebooks in general, I'm a fan, having moved 24 times in the last 39 years. For simple text novels, I've found I can read faster on my Kindle, and can adjust the font size - something I now like to do, as the large text versions of hardcopy books are pretty limited. However, beyond simple text, books with images, diagrams and varying font sizes and colors are not good in ereaders, and I find tablets too heavy to hold comfortably for long.
One thing I don't understand is the use of lower paper quality on some books these days - it's almost as bad as the wartime books from the 1940s. Books less than 15 years old are sometimes yellowed and starting to crumble - hardly robust. I imagine some publishers are always trying to squeeze those nickels.
Awkward silence
Date: 2018-02-17 08:32 pm (UTC)The other thing is the ability to camouflage your reading habits when (like mine) they veer toward the trashy.
Re: Awkward silence
Date: 2018-02-18 02:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-17 08:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-18 02:37 am (UTC)print journalism
Date: 2018-02-18 06:14 pm (UTC)Specialty weeklys like the San Francisco Bay Guardian that cover local issues in depth, usually from a progressive point of view and have local film and concert listings and neighborhood papers that feature the church clam bake and school sports scores seem to be hanging in, as it is still handy to grab a free paper to look up the movie times and music clubs ads.
And there are still people who don't feel informed unless they have read the Washington Post or the New York Times.
Rita Rippetoe
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-18 02:25 am (UTC)David, by the lake
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-18 02:39 am (UTC)retail rents
Date: 2018-02-18 06:26 pm (UTC)Rita Rippetoe
Books
Date: 2018-02-18 03:53 am (UTC)Onward to the actual subject. Real books are great, but Kindle’s a godsend to
Those with limited shelf space!
Techno Sweets
Date: 2018-02-18 06:06 am (UTC)Re: Techno Sweets
Date: 2018-02-18 06:26 pm (UTC)Re: Techno Sweets
Date: 2018-02-18 10:38 pm (UTC)Re: Techno Sweets
Date: 2018-02-19 01:28 am (UTC)Re: Techno Sweets
Date: 2018-02-20 04:23 pm (UTC)http://exhibits.library.jhu.edu/files/original/14f4f8432f2a53156301bc064d622aaa.jpg
On the Shadows of the Ideas paperback
Date: 2018-02-18 02:38 pm (UTC)Will it also be published in paperback eventually?
- Brigyn
(no subject)
Date: 2018-02-21 10:37 am (UTC)I've noticed on the train a big rise in people with books again. I used to see people reading a lot on the train, with actual books, several years ago. One nice thing about them is that you can see the covers and get a sense of the popularity of some things, some times even people would stop quickly to talk about how much they loved a book with a stranger. Then it switched to e-readers in a big way and I never saw anyone with books. Then maybe after a year or two I started to see people reading on their tablets or phones (at least that is what I think happened, it was harder to tell at a glance, but I'd see screens of text with no pictures so that was what my impression was). Then it seemed like people were just texting or playing tile flipping type video games on their phones for a while, but occasionally I would see somebody reading some real classic in book form, like Moby Dick or something. Now I see books often again, not quite at it's peak but getting closer.
Personally I stayed with physical books the whole time but I'm happy to see the change. I thought the loss of the social/cultural things around reading (the things you can subtract from the experience without obviously seeming to lose anything in the switch from books to e-readers) was a bit sad but I think a lot of people probably felt some of that themselves too. My other thinking is that their e-readers just stopped working, haha.
Thanks,
Johnny