Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 234

[ecosophia]

We are now well into the fifth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary all these years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health remain anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; new revelations are leaking out about just how bad the Covid vaccines are for human health; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.

5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

7. Please don't post LLM ("AI") generated text. This is a place for human beings to talk to other human beings, not for the regurgitation of machine-generated text. Also, please don't discuss large language models (the technology popularly and inaccurately called "artificial intelligence" these days) except as they bear directly on the Covid phenomenon. Here again, my finger is hovering over the delete button. 

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.

With that said, the floor is open for discussion. 

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

FDA Vaccine and Biotech Chief Dr. Vinay Prasad LEAVES Agency for SECOND Time in Under a Year

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/03/fda-vaccine-biotech-chief-dr-vinay-prasad-leaves/

it seems to me kind of a mess at places like fda and cdc..

[(Anonymous)]

some good news


Florida Senate passes ‘Medical Freedom Act’

https://thecapitolist.com/florida-senate-passes-medical-freedom-act/

[(Anonymous)]

The Senate passed it, but the House has announced that they aren't going to even consider a vote on it, so it's not actually law in Florida, and won't be any time soon. Alas.

[(Anonymous)]

Canada set to surpass 100,000 assisted suicides — more than the country’s WWII death toll

https://nypost.com/2026/03/07/world-news/canada-set-to-pass-100000-assisted-suicide-deaths-before-programs-10th-anniversary-societal-failing/

this seems very wrong to me.

[(Anonymous)]

It seems very wrong (and downright evil) to a lot of us Canucks, too. First it was legalized to enable the terminally ill who were in agony to make a quick exit from life - but that was the thin edge of the wedge. Now it has become an industry. Each year the permissible reasons for getting 'MAiDed' expands and the number of persons getting legally 'offed' increases. Just yesterday I saw a job advertisement for a 'MAiD' Doctor by the Government of the Northwest Territories (I guess that there's a lot of sad people living there right now). Calling all Dr. Mengeles!

The best thing about MAiD (from the government-pharmaceutical industrial complex perspective) is that so many of the people who have been severely harmed by the 'foxes' opt out of life. This buries a lot of evidence - unless family members of the deceased speak up to the alternative media.

Ron M

[fredsmith11]

Comes a time when the MIC's (Medical Industrial Complex) ability to milk money out of a patient comes to an end, so encouraging them to off themselves at that point makes financial sense.

A distant relative here has scheduled his departure for this coming Saturday. He told me 18 months ago he was injured by his booster shot. When I asked him why he took it his answer was "I wanted to go to the pub".

He is currently riddled with a variety of cancers. Funny that.

[(Anonymous)]

here is an article going around.
and i think more will come going forward, more disclosure will hapen

CIA faces furious backlash after hidden document with potential cure for cancer is declassified after 60 years

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15629211/cia-cancer-cure-document-declassified.html

[stubborn_ass]

I have a sense... an inkling that the paper's conclusions actually made it much further in terms of information dissemination in the 60's and 70's. During the coof era... as a few people (a very few) told their oncologists that they were using dewormers to treat their cancers, a common refrain heard was that oh, yes, there's always been evidence since the 60's that dewormers do something against cancer. My guess is that there were probably small scales studies done in the west, with very positive conclusions, and then they were quickly shut down. That was the pattern that we saw with VIM all through the 80's, 90's and naught's.

I can't emphasize enough, the medical industrial complex chose to make people go through chemo / radiation since the 60's... when much more effective and non-toxic dewormers could have been used instead.

[(Anonymous)]

Former Missouri GOP House Speaker Sentenced to Prison for Pandemic Fraud – Sentenced to 21 Months in Prison

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/03/former-missouri-gop-house-speaker-sentenced-prison-pandemic/



and more fraud..

[(Anonymous)]

Post# 193 follows post #233?

[ecosophia]

Sorry 'bout that. The autofill did autofill things, but I've fixed it.

[(Anonymous)]

here is an article about the court hearing in amsterdam, march 9th ( you can't find it on mainstream news sites)

Amsterdam Court – Appeal to Hear Expert Witness Testimony in High Profile Case

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/amsterdam-court-appeal-to-hear-expert-witness-testimony-in-high-profile-case/

from article:

'The decision will determine whether the high court will allow the district court to hear expert witness testimony from Dr Mike Yeadon (former Pfizer VP), Sasha Latypova (former Pharma executive and researcher), Katherine Watt (international law expert and legal analyst), Catherine Austin Fitts (financial analyst and former US government official), and Dr Joseph Sansone (clinical psychologist) in a preliminary pre-trial evidence hearing ahead of the main civil case.'

'The main lawsuit will proceed regardless of the outcome – but if the appeal succeeds, it kicks the door wide open to early scrutiny of the evidence… and disclosure from the defendants. If it fails, the claimants may still present those experts later during the normal trial process.'


also, here is a ~3 min rumble clip with Peter Stassen, explaining about it:

https://rumble.com/v76wrwc-history-made-today-lawyer-took-on-bill-gates-and-other-genociding.html

week 234

[(Anonymous)]

Week 234

Dear JMG and dear forumistas, thank you.

Well, what can I say, my previous respect (I did once have a bit) for the mainstream media is so far down in the abyss there's no point in yodeling at it.

Yet another story they aren't touching, and that I take as excellent news— Jeff Childers reports:

* * * * *
* * * * *

CHILDERS QUOTE:
Like I keep telling you, this isn’t over by a long shot. Yesterday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Sambrano v. United Airlines, affirming class certification for United Airlines pilots and flight attendants who refused the jab on religious grounds and got “accommodated” right out of a paycheck. Corporate media has completely ignored this terrific story. You’re hearing it here first.
You may recall that, back during the pandemic panic, United Airlines was the most aggressive airline in the country on vaccine mandates. Get the shot or get out. No ifs, ands, or spiritual buts. In all, 5,885 employees requested religious or medical accommodations, and —in a very cowardly fashion— 4,070 were technically “granted” and the employees were “accommodated.”

It was just rhetorical sleight of hand. Guess what “accommodated” meant?

Yep. You know. The Fifth Circuit’s opinion explained that United planned to place all exempted employees “on unpaid leave beginning on October 2, 2021, and ending whenever the ‘pandemic meaningfully receded.’” In other words: Sure, you can practice your faith. You just can’t practice your profession. Or eat. Eventually, United let non-customer-facing employees come back with masks and testing. But pilots and flight attendants stayed parked on the tarmac — 2,221 employees stranded on indefinite, unpaid leave.

According to United, “indefinite, unpaid leave” is nothing like being fired. True, you have no job, and no prospects of a job in the near future. And you got no paycheck or benefits. But you still had to follow company policy, like not defaming the company. Obviously, as everyone knows who was there, “unpaid leave” was a sham and a fraud, designed to force the employees to quit so United didn’t have to fire them.

The courageous pilots sued, alleging United “forced them to choose between taking the vaccine in violation of their faiths or at the expense of their health and their livelihoods.” The district court certified the class. United appealed. And yesterday, a three-judge panel — Judges Higginson, Willett, and Engelhardt — essentially said, Nice try, United. In legal language: “We AFFIRM.”

As one X commenter who identified herself as a United employee put it: “We are the largest class ever certified against a private employer for religious discrimination. Almost 2,000 were put on indefinite, unpaid leave or terminated.”

Now they all get discovery. Depositions. Damages. All the things corporate lawyers scare their clients about. And plaintiffs have been winning these cases all over the country. This is just the biggest one yet. It’ll be the most expensive.

Four years ago, United’s CEO bragged about having the toughest mandate in the airline industry and “leading the way.” Now his airline is leading the way into the largest religious discrimination class action ever certified against a private employer — in the jab-hostile Fifth Circuit, no less. It’s accountability. It’s consequences for treating employees’ religious beliefs and personal medical freedom like minor turbulence.

Fasten your seat belts, United, and please keep them fastened for the duration of the lawsuit. Do not get up and move about the courtroom. And keep your damnable seatbacks in the full and upright position, folded like a bologna sandwich, you nincompoops.

END OF CHILDERS QUOTE
* * * * *
* * * * *

PS About Jeff Childers. I don't happen to agree with his every take on things (to begin with, he's an ardent Born Again), but I find him a far more reliable source of news I would consider relevant than the NYT & ilk.

Cetiosaurus

[(Anonymous)]

An interesting new substack post from John Beaudoin. He outlines why he believes that the huge rise in reported "acute kidney injury" after the jab probably reveals that the real number of myocarditis cases is vastly greater than the official line.

Why? Because AKI is a comparatively slow cause of death, with plenty of lab tests and a paper trail that make it hard to deny. Myocarditis often produces sudden death, easier to dismiss as bad luck or just old age. Almost no autopsies were performed on such sudden deaths. He thinks "rare, but only in young males" is a limited hangout.

Beaudoin remains one of my favorite covid truth-tellers.

https://therealcdc.substack.com/p/myocarditis-vs-acute-kidney-injury


*Ochre Harebrained Curmudgeon*

[(Anonymous)]

Ochre Harebrained Curmudgeon, I second your recommendation.
Cetiosaurus

[jpc_w]

From the SubStack of "Dr. Wojack", embedded video saying 30% refusal in the UK, and apparently much of the world: https://substack.com/@drwojakmd/note/c-225812593?r=1b6fyd

So it seems like the hypnosis hypothesis is still on the table.

NZ Commission of Inquiry Report

[k_a_nitz]

The report of New Zealand's Commission of Inquiry into the Covid response has been published. A good summary of key points is https://aniobrien.substack.com/p/covid-inquiry-should-raise-serious-questions (she has a later post going into the silence of the media over it). As is to be expected, the media ignored most of the criticisms that the report raised (like the fact that "roughly half of the $60 billion spent under the banner of COVID response, and spread across 821 programmes, was not directly related to the pandemic itself" - basically a fiscal splurge ($30 bn is a lot in the NZ context)).

Excerpt from the summary by Ani O'Brien:
"Instead of cautious, evidence-led policy, the report describes a pattern where political leaders overrode advice from officials and pushed ahead with their own preferred decisions. At the centre of that pattern sits Chris Hipkins [current leader of the opposition] who repeatedly took papers to Cabinet with expert advice as well as his own alternative recommendations which were inevitably adopted.

Chris Hipkins is not a doctor, an epidemiologist, an immunologist, or a public health specialist. He has no clinical training and no scientific background. Hipkins has a Bachelor of Arts majoring in Politics and Criminology from Victoria University of Wellington (no shade, I have a BA as well). But he is a career politician whose experience before the pandemic was a stint working for an oil company and then working in the office of Trevor Mallard [former Minister of Parliament].

Yet during the most significant public health crisis in a century he repeatedly chose to override or depart from the advice of the experts the government employed to guide the response. In a democracy ministers ultimately make the call, but when a politician with no medical training sets aside the advice of doctors, scientists, and emergency planners on decisions affecting millions of people, the public is entitled to ask what exactly made him so certain he knew better?"

[(Anonymous)]

Canada convenes special committee to consider expanding euthanasia to include mental illness

A Special Joint Parliamentary Committee is made up of 10 MPs and five senators who will look at further expanding Canada's Medical Assistance in Dying program.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canada-convenes-special-committee-to-consider-expanding-euthanasia-to-include-mental-illness/

i guess it will keep expanding..

[(Anonymous)]

And to think that at the time that I was growing up in Canada we thought the euthanasia programs of Nazi Germany were absolutely barbaric. I guess 'we' are the barbarians now...

Ron M

[(Anonymous)]

In a few days it will be six years since the start of the lockdowns.

Right at the beginning we were told:

"It's only for two weeks to flatten the curve."

What followed was two years of ever increasing escalation and shifting of the goal posts.

Initially it all sounded reasonable, but then it had to. If we had been told at the beginning of 2020 to expect two years of lockdowns, masks, intrusive testing, with all this culminating in an experimental injection being forced onto the public, then no-one would have supported it.

Now that we understand how cold and flu viruses spread, it's easy to see how much of a lie the initial "two weeks to slow the spread" rationale really was. It was based on the exponential growth lie, that the virus would sweep through and infect most of the population in only a couple of months because people had no immunity to it (another lie). What really happens with the flu is that it only infects less than 5% of the population in any given year and is only around for a couple of months. We also now know that there is no herd immunity for cold viruses and that they never go away, unlike the initial lies we were told about covid.

The playbook for covid is pretty clear now. Start off with relatively modest and reasonable sounding measures to crack the door open, and then shove the door wide open and roll out all the totalitarian measures that were always intended.

[(Anonymous)]

It was quite the daring and ruthless psy op. And I expect that similar psy ops will work just as well the next time on the people who get all their info from the TV. It won't be so likely to work on so many of the rest of the people, however, they're wise to it now.

Covid and pregnancies

[drhooves]

My nephew's wife had a healthy baby boy a couple of weeks ago, and that was good news - considering he had been vaxxed during The Madness, though his wife had not been.

I was poking around looking for more info on pregnancies, Covid, and which scenarios were around the mRNA and the spike protein (vaxxed vs. catching the virus). I also was interested in the "shedding" factor and if that had any impact.

I found this recent article which seems to contradict another one posted here about a month ago, where shedding was suggested as to how the unvaccinated women in the study had spike proteins (or mRNA) in the placentas, while this article seems to suggest catching the virus itself was the source of the spike proteins.

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0344185

Google is no longer my friend. I can't find hardly anything I consider semi-reliable, since all the articles seem to have "very rare" as part of the Jab side effects, which is right up there with "safe and effective" in terms of accuracy.

Being a new parent isn't easy these days, as I understand my nephew and his wife are leaning away from the recommended vax schedule for the little tyke, which is still something like 72+ or so (IIRC) between birth and the baby's third birthday.

Re: Covid and pregnancies

[(Anonymous)]

Being a parent during the post pandemic period has been grinding me into dust.

My seven year old has had an off and on again cough for a few years now. We went to a pulmonary specialist, been following the prescribed protocol, but it’s starting to feel like that definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results each time. The latest episode was bad. We were told to double the dosage, and sure enough, a few days later, cough be gone. I understood my spouse as being hesitant about the ongoing use of a steroid inhaler, but those concerns seem mute, at least for now. It is a relief to see her suffering subsided.

All that aside, I am convinced that the collective effect of the cooties shots on kids has been an ongoing, slow motion nightmare. I was able to avoid direct uptake for my children, but we’re deep in the blue. Can’t resist what’s being shed all over you, and the ailments I see always make me wonder. It grinds on me, really.

Rebel News

[(Anonymous)]

Hi,
I just read on Rebel News that shutting Canadians up in Quarantine Hotels was not a public health measure at all. Internal government emails show Melanie Joly negotiating with chain hotels which had connections to the Liberal Party to send them captive customers to keep them afloat during the pandemic. Canadian voters were required to foot the bill for the Governments bailout of corporate hotels. Nice one!
Maxine

Re: Rebel News

[(Anonymous)]

Maxine, Oh yes, that was a yummy biz and the money went into some, um, interesting pockets, I do not doubt it. Anytime the government can award a contract, that's where there's likely to be some money flowing somewhere it might not, were there some sunshine upon it. Who got the contract to mow the lawn and plant petunias on the meridian on Main Boulevard? Was it an open bid process? Oop, didn't think so. And who owns the consulting biz that's doing a "report" for the mayor / board of supervisors / governor / etc?

What's so appalling to me is that by this avenue of the quaratine hotel contracts, and by various other avenues (such as the mandated jabs) we citizens got, abracadabra, turned into chattel to be milked.

30% refused??

[(Anonymous)]

The problem is with how you define 'vaccinated'. Is it one, two or three doses needed?

"Over 9 in 10 people aged 12 years and over in the UK had received one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, nearly 9 in 10 had received two doses and around 7 in 10 had received three or more doses by the end of August 2022."

Unfortunately I think the above is true in the UK at least. So the true rate is 90% are vaccinated as a lot of people stopped at 2 doses. It's only 70% jabbed if you consider 3 or more doses as 'vaccinated'.

https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/conditionsanddiseases/articles/coronaviruscovid19latestinsights/vaccines

Re: 30% refused??

[(Anonymous)]

You're not vaccinated until you are dead.

(OT and Not necessarily for publication)

[(Anonymous)]

Hi, JMG:

Something odd has been going on with the Dreamwidth site this week.
I can get onto it in the morning (such as now), but in the evenings when I try, I get a "Gateway Error". DuckDuckGo says this happens when a server takes too long to respond, such as when its traffic is too high. Something to mention to the Dreamwidth host if you haven't already.

Your 'Ecosophia' blog and the rest of the internet have been working fine for me.

Thanks,

- Cicada Grove

Re: (OT and Not necessarily for publication)

[(Anonymous)]

Ditto. I suspect the server routing pathways are being disrupted by slow breakdown of internet traffic due to genreal crapification or sloppy programming for lowel level connections used in rural areas.

Cafe Locked Out

[(Anonymous)]

It's about 7 minutes long. I found it well worth listening.

Michael Gray Griffith
What If the Battle is for Our Hearts?
https://cafelockeddown.substack.com/p/what-if-the-battle-is-for-our-hearts

[scotlyn]

Here is one for the meme collection. Consent is central to ethics.

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s_!ORDX!,w_424,c_limit,f_webp,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fff74329f-6453-4ff8-86ff-7e9b64f1e6d6_526x639.png

[(Anonymous)]

Good one
but eeeuw

[(Anonymous)]

a post from dr makis:

BREAKING NEWS: Helping Cancer patients is now ILLEGAL in Canada, as Alberta Premier Danielle Smith punishes over 9000 Cancer patients for exercising their "Right to Try" with Ivermectin

My Cancer work in Canada is officially done.
I'm moving to Florida and will work there.

Helping Cancer patients is now illegal in Canada.
Health Coaching of Cancer patients is now illegal.
Naturopathy is now illegal.
Using Ivermectin and repurposed drugs is now illegal.
Doing podcasts and videos on Health is now illegal.

All punishable by up to 2 years imprisonment.

Canadians have no idea what has just transpired and what Canada has recently turned into.

The actions of Canadian authorities (pictured below, including far left extremist woke bureaucrats of the Alberta College of Physicians and Surgeons) amount to attempted murder of Cancer patients who wanted cutting edge options for their disease.

Canadians, your options are all GONE.

Please STOP asking me for help at this point.

You could have and should have stopped the Canadian authorities from doing any of this.
There were plenty of opportunities to do so.
Now it's too late.

Of course, Premier Danielle Smith's Alberta government can stop cancer patients from being harmed and reverse all of these actions within 24 hours. But they won't. They intend to kill every last Cancer patient instead.

We are documenting these deaths as they happen.

I've done all I could here, in Canada.
I've gone above and beyond.

When my Florida Cancer Clinic opens, look for me then. It will be BUSY

Good luck everyone! God bless

https://xcancel.com/MakisMedicine/status/2032463745499205891#m

[scotlyn]

I have to tell you all that (at least in the British Isles) anyone being trained in any form of "alternative" medicine will be told at some point during their training - "never, ever, never - did I say never? - ever claim to be able to treat cancer". Arguments have raged as to whether the British Cancer Act of 1939, which strictly regulates the claims that health products and treatments can make, really does make it illegal to treat cancer. However, the act has had a very chilling effect for decades, and has effectively reserved treatment to the official establishment, which itself remains reticent to offer such an outlandish thing as a cure. And, in the rare cases of malpractice that DO get lodged against alternative practitioners, versions of this legal framework generally feature.

For myself, the question is relatively easy to deal with. As an acupuncturist, I don't treat "conditions", I treat people. Full stop, end of story.

However, this would not be the first time (and will not be the last), that this specific dis-ease is strictly relegated to officialdom, and strongly punitive against the holding out of any alternative to what officialdom has on offer.

Cancer, cancer, everywhere...and most of the cases I know of are metastatic aggressive

[(Anonymous)]

I'm trying not to go overboard in attributing every cancer to Clot Shots; we all know cancer was a major disease long before Pfizer and Moderna. However, I am finding it increasingly hard not to notice the large number of people I know -- most of them less than age sixty, many less than age forty -- who have been diagnosed with late stage, usually widely metastasized, super-aggressive cancers within 1 or 2 degrees of relation in my small circle of family and friends. And, in almost every case, the person was multi-vexxed.

The latest bombshell was a sibling of mine who goes to the doctors many times a year, getting all manner of care, who took many-many vexxines, and wouldn't take my advise to stay away, who "suddenly" been found to have cancer aggressively growing in at least 5 major, different, organs. But I know many others.

I used to have a relatively hard time thinking of anyone with cancer, who didn't smoke. Now it seems so commonplace.

Question: does anyone know any well conducted statistical studies which are tracking cancer rates by various segments of the population -- obviously including Vexinations, age, sex, organs, and point at which is was diagnosed?

Also, I can hardly understand why is it so easy to diagnose these organ cancers AFTER they have massively metastasized ... but not during regular, routine, semi-annual bloodwork and doctor visits? I used to think doctors were wise and smart and curious. There seems little enough evidence of that in 99% of them, at this point.

This is just so heart-breaking and seems so unnecessary.

Re: Cancer, cancer, everywhere...and most of the cases I know of are metastatic aggressive

[(Anonymous)]

Anonymous, I am very sorry about the news of your sibling's cancer.

I too have stories. I too find it all heart-breaking and unecessary.

As I see it, now my work on earth is first of all to abide. This is a simple and yet heroic task. I pray for grace. And may all who wish to receive it receive grace from the divine.

[transcriberb]

I just had a dinner conversation in the course of which I learned that 3 members of my extended family and my relative's friend's husband had all "died suddenly" 2 years ago. In this same conversation we also rehashed the sudden death a few months ago of a mutual friend (apparently in good health when seen at a wedding, but then suffered fatal spesis following emergency heart surgery).

Jabs as possible cause of these deaths? Um, I hear elephants trumpeting in the distance.

Relatedly, here's a transcript of a video of 2021 that I came upon only last week:

Nurse Practitioner Tamika Morrow Talks About the Data
"They're saying it's a safe vaccine. Well that's not the truth... Stay away from the vaccine, it's dangerous."
https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/234009.html