Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 234
Mar. 10th, 2026 11:28 am
We are now well into the fifth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary all these years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health remain anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:
1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.
2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue.
4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.
5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.
6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.
7. Please don't post LLM ("AI") generated text. This is a place for human beings to talk to other human beings, not for the regurgitation of machine-generated text. Also, please don't discuss large language models (the technology popularly and inaccurately called "artificial intelligence" these days) except as they bear directly on the Covid phenomenon. Here again, my finger is hovering over the delete button.
Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.
With that said, the floor is open for discussion.
(no subject)
Date: 2026-03-10 03:58 pm (UTC)https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/03/fda-vaccine-biotech-chief-dr-vinay-prasad-leaves/
it seems to me kind of a mess at places like fda and cdc..
(no subject)
Date: 2026-03-10 03:59 pm (UTC)Florida Senate passes ‘Medical Freedom Act’
https://thecapitolist.com/florida-senate-passes-medical-freedom-act/
(no subject)
Date: 2026-03-10 04:01 pm (UTC)https://nypost.com/2026/03/07/world-news/canada-set-to-pass-100000-assisted-suicide-deaths-before-programs-10th-anniversary-societal-failing/
this seems very wrong to me.
(no subject)
Date: 2026-03-10 04:04 pm (UTC)and i think more will come going forward, more disclosure will hapen
CIA faces furious backlash after hidden document with potential cure for cancer is declassified after 60 years
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-15629211/cia-cancer-cure-document-declassified.html
(no subject)
Date: 2026-03-10 04:06 pm (UTC)https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/03/former-missouri-gop-house-speaker-sentenced-prison-pandemic/
and more fraud..
(no subject)
Date: 2026-03-10 04:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2026-03-10 05:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2026-03-10 05:00 pm (UTC)Amsterdam Court – Appeal to Hear Expert Witness Testimony in High Profile Case
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/amsterdam-court-appeal-to-hear-expert-witness-testimony-in-high-profile-case/
from article:
'The decision will determine whether the high court will allow the district court to hear expert witness testimony from Dr Mike Yeadon (former Pfizer VP), Sasha Latypova (former Pharma executive and researcher), Katherine Watt (international law expert and legal analyst), Catherine Austin Fitts (financial analyst and former US government official), and Dr Joseph Sansone (clinical psychologist) in a preliminary pre-trial evidence hearing ahead of the main civil case.'
'The main lawsuit will proceed regardless of the outcome – but if the appeal succeeds, it kicks the door wide open to early scrutiny of the evidence… and disclosure from the defendants. If it fails, the claimants may still present those experts later during the normal trial process.'
also, here is a ~3 min rumble clip with Peter Stassen, explaining about it:
https://rumble.com/v76wrwc-history-made-today-lawyer-took-on-bill-gates-and-other-genociding.html
week 234
Date: 2026-03-10 06:25 pm (UTC)Dear JMG and dear forumistas, thank you.
Well, what can I say, my previous respect (I did once have a bit) for the mainstream media is so far down in the abyss there's no point in yodeling at it.
Yet another story they aren't touching, and that I take as excellent news— Jeff Childers reports:
* * * * *
* * * * *
CHILDERS QUOTE:
Like I keep telling you, this isn’t over by a long shot. Yesterday, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in Sambrano v. United Airlines, affirming class certification for United Airlines pilots and flight attendants who refused the jab on religious grounds and got “accommodated” right out of a paycheck. Corporate media has completely ignored this terrific story. You’re hearing it here first.
You may recall that, back during the pandemic panic, United Airlines was the most aggressive airline in the country on vaccine mandates. Get the shot or get out. No ifs, ands, or spiritual buts. In all, 5,885 employees requested religious or medical accommodations, and —in a very cowardly fashion— 4,070 were technically “granted” and the employees were “accommodated.”
It was just rhetorical sleight of hand. Guess what “accommodated” meant?
Yep. You know. The Fifth Circuit’s opinion explained that United planned to place all exempted employees “on unpaid leave beginning on October 2, 2021, and ending whenever the ‘pandemic meaningfully receded.’” In other words: Sure, you can practice your faith. You just can’t practice your profession. Or eat. Eventually, United let non-customer-facing employees come back with masks and testing. But pilots and flight attendants stayed parked on the tarmac — 2,221 employees stranded on indefinite, unpaid leave.
According to United, “indefinite, unpaid leave” is nothing like being fired. True, you have no job, and no prospects of a job in the near future. And you got no paycheck or benefits. But you still had to follow company policy, like not defaming the company. Obviously, as everyone knows who was there, “unpaid leave” was a sham and a fraud, designed to force the employees to quit so United didn’t have to fire them.
The courageous pilots sued, alleging United “forced them to choose between taking the vaccine in violation of their faiths or at the expense of their health and their livelihoods.” The district court certified the class. United appealed. And yesterday, a three-judge panel — Judges Higginson, Willett, and Engelhardt — essentially said, Nice try, United. In legal language: “We AFFIRM.”
As one X commenter who identified herself as a United employee put it: “We are the largest class ever certified against a private employer for religious discrimination. Almost 2,000 were put on indefinite, unpaid leave or terminated.”
Now they all get discovery. Depositions. Damages. All the things corporate lawyers scare their clients about. And plaintiffs have been winning these cases all over the country. This is just the biggest one yet. It’ll be the most expensive.
Four years ago, United’s CEO bragged about having the toughest mandate in the airline industry and “leading the way.” Now his airline is leading the way into the largest religious discrimination class action ever certified against a private employer — in the jab-hostile Fifth Circuit, no less. It’s accountability. It’s consequences for treating employees’ religious beliefs and personal medical freedom like minor turbulence.
Fasten your seat belts, United, and please keep them fastened for the duration of the lawsuit. Do not get up and move about the courtroom. And keep your damnable seatbacks in the full and upright position, folded like a bologna sandwich, you nincompoops.
END OF CHILDERS QUOTE
* * * * *
* * * * *
PS About Jeff Childers. I don't happen to agree with his every take on things (to begin with, he's an ardent Born Again), but I find him a far more reliable source of news I would consider relevant than the NYT & ilk.
Cetiosaurus