Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 150

[ecosophia]

We are now winding up the third year of these open posts. As the phrase "died suddenly" repeats in the mass media like a mantra, statistics for work days lost to illness and all-cause mortality mount up in heavily vaccinated nations, and more and more ugly facts about the official response to Covid spill out into public, we are entering what may well turn out to be the most difficult period of the Covid disaster -- the phase in which denial rises in lockstep with the death rate, and a great many people try not to admit what has been done to them by the people and institutions they trusted. It could get ugly, folks.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Comments

Garland Nixon on COVID

[fredsmith11]

Garland mainly does insightful and entertaining political commentary, but here he branches out into COVID and bioweapons.

This first podcast has info I hadn't come across before about early COVID timelines and shenanigans, involvement of the usual suspects: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GFTGV4v-elI

This one looks at the broader picture involving work on COVID and other bioweapons in US-funded labs around the world: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ntstDNqiwA0

Re: Garland Nixon on COVID

[stubborn_ass]

Yes a strong second regarding his politcal commentary.

I think it was more than a year ago, where he first mentioned the coof, and how he avoided taking the shots as it didn't make sense to him given the inherent risks of something so new. Plus he could see that all the demonization of HCQ and VIM, and he got himself a small stash and when he finally got the coof, he got over it quick and easy. He alluded to the fact that he had pointed not talked about it as he knew the censorship on YT were super draconian, and his main focus was on politics anyways, but he felt that the official pressure to keep the narrative going had become much weaker and he put out that 'feeler' video.

One thing I realized over time.. the folks that I continued to watch on YT, eventually all out themselves as sceptical of the shots. Their views may not always agree with each other or myself, but interesting and cogent arguments are always worth listening to... in case there's something I'd missed. The folks that jab, I can see their cognitive function diminish over time... if it's routine stuff that they yak about, they can fall back on a lifetime of habit and make it seem like they're still able to motoring along mentally. But unusual or new stuff, I can see that they're no longer able to process the info. Big big clue about their jab status.

Re: Garland Nixon on COVID

[(Anonymous)]

I've noticed this too in the mental processes and behaviour of the multi-injected: they seem to be functioning normally, but it's as though they are running on automatic. Some odd memory losses,too. I expect them to subside into dementia eventually.

Re: Garland Nixon on COVID

[(Anonymous)]

I've seen this. And it seems to me that oftentimes, in the last few years, especially in the elderly, the dementia comes on very quickly, almost overnight, much faster than what I observed in previous decades.