I am trying to word this carefully so as to make clear I'm only expressing my own views and concerns.
A few years ago, I eagerly lapped up any information I could find from David Wilcock's work. I now consider that almost entirely a mistake. I feel that anything of either spiritual or practical value from him, has been much better said by much cooler heads I now find far more credible and trustworthy.
I agree DW says many alien/UFO experiences are spiritual, metaphysical, higher dimensional, etc.
Other than that, there are many differences between what DW and JMG present in their careers. There are also many differences in where they each say their information came from, what specific predictions they've made about political and spiritual events obvious to the whole world, how past unhappy experiences especially in childhood affect their current work, and the extent of troubles they've had with previous publishers or platforms. There are also many differences in what others have said about what it's like to deal with them, what kind of emotional and social maturity they demonstrate, and whether or not they've been involved in lawsuits around intellectual property claims regarding he information they've presented.
To me, these differences are so extensive, profound, and seem to add up to a certain conclusion, that make me highly regret time and effort I spent studying DW's work. I now think everything of value from him is only a small part of his work, and better presented by others.
I think this is all I could appropriately say here.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
Not a DW fan
Date: 2024-02-06 04:55 am (UTC)A few years ago, I eagerly lapped up any information I could find from David Wilcock's work. I now consider that almost entirely a mistake. I feel that anything of either spiritual or practical value from him, has been much better said by much cooler heads I now find far more credible and trustworthy.
I agree DW says many alien/UFO experiences are spiritual, metaphysical, higher dimensional, etc.
Other than that, there are many differences between what DW and JMG present in their careers. There are also many differences in where they each say their information came from, what specific predictions they've made about political and spiritual events obvious to the whole world, how past unhappy experiences especially in childhood affect their current work, and the extent of troubles they've had with previous publishers or platforms. There are also many differences in what others have said about what it's like to deal with them, what kind of emotional and social maturity they demonstrate, and whether or not they've been involved in lawsuits around intellectual property claims regarding he information they've presented.
To me, these differences are so extensive, profound, and seem to add up to a certain conclusion, that make me highly regret time and effort I spent studying DW's work. I now think everything of value from him is only a small part of his work, and better presented by others.
I think this is all I could appropriately say here.