Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 65
Nov. 1st, 2022 11:47 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
ecosophia
As we proceed through the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselesness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries. So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:
1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.
2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue.
4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religious, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.
With that said, the floor is open for discussion.
Re: Dr John Campbell UK
Date: 2022-11-07 02:18 am (UTC)Note his product placement in the video: plastic bottles with large handwritten "Vit K2" and "Vit D" labels on the windowsill. Those are ugly; why not put them away before filming? Perhaps they're relevant to the topic somehow - relevant in some way that he thinks the censors would not like him to explain? Viewers accustomed to censorship regimes will quickly pick up on the oddity and, as JMG might say, treat it as a topic for meditation....
You suggest he go to Rumble, but that site is known for being alt-right and hosting a variety of misinformation. If that were his platform a lot of people would assume he was just another screaming extremist and never watch his videos. The fact that he's on YouTube addressing the general public, and doing so in a calm, careful, rational way, makes him far more believable. He doesn't wail about a new fear or rumor every week. He's all about facts and data. Here are the figures: what the government says has actually happened, about which anyone can speak. What could have caused them? He can't say. Which means, of course, that he just DID say. And he's not only telling us that he thinks there's a problem, but that he thinks he'd be silenced if he said so, which means there's another very severe problem at hand. The guy is brilliant.
-Translucent Jejune Octopus
Re: Dr John Campbell UK
Date: 2022-11-07 04:20 am (UTC)Well said!
I'm not a big fan, I've only watched a couple of his videos, but one I went so far as to transcribe because his silence, as he stared at the camera, was simply brilliant.
I think I posted this previously on this forum, but don't have the link handy, so here it is again:
# # #
EXCESS BABY DEATH INVESTIGATION
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTE: On his popular YouTube channel Dr. John Campbell discusses and educates on matters related to covid. Since the Pfizer document dump https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents starting in 2021 [ https://phmpt.org/pfizers-documents ] he has become increasingly alarmed and critical of government policy in regards to covid jabs, however he has always been extremely careful to avoid triggering YouTube's censorship. He uses the word "jag" instead of jab, for example, and in one crucial instance, he simply says nothing while staring pointedly into the camera.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=wj4rE0LrpR0&t=626s
Posted October 20, 2022
TRANSCRIPT OF BRIEF EXCERPT
5:09
DR. JOHN CAMPBELL: [quoting newspaper] "Covid Scotland"-- This is another well-known Scottish NEWSPAPER, The Herald, reporting-- [quoting newspaper] "Covid Scotland: Vaccines ruled out in neonatal deaths spike" according to this report from the Herald.
[quoting newspaper] "Public health experts ruled out any link between spikes in neonatal deaths and the Covid vaccine".
But the Herald does note, this was [quoting newspaper] "without checking whether any of the infants' mothers had received the jag during pregnancy."
[quoting newspaper] "Experts stressed, no 'plausible' link to justify investigation of maternal vaccination status."
So they're saying there's no need to investigate the mums' vaccine status in these babies that have tragically died in the neonatal period. This is not necessary.
[quoting newspaper] "Public Health Scotland said its consultants had given 'careful consideration' to the 'potential benefits and harms' of carrying out such an analysis as part of its probe into the tragic deaths of 39 infants.'"
But concluded against doing so.
Public Health Scotland added— this is, so the Herald's got this from different bits and bobs from the Freedom of Information requests and other statements. They put it together.
[quoting newspaper] "A risk that 'identifying the vaccination status of the mother, even at aggregate level"
So in other words, that's not individuals [?] numbers, even that
[quoting newspaper] "would result harm to those individuals and others close to them"
Which of course we wouldn't want.
[quoting newspaper] "through actual or perceived judgement of the effects of their personal vaccination decision"
[quoting newspaper] "the outcome of such analysis, whilst being
uninformative for public health decision making, had the potential to be used to harm vaccine confidence at this critical time."
So information regarding this would be uninformative for public health decision making.
So NHS [National Health Service], this is a Freedom of Information response from Public Health Scotland, [quoting document, quoted in newspaper] "We do not have any plans to examine maternal vaccination status, as there is no public health reason to do so."
7:25
[Dr. Campbell turns and faces the camera directly and stares, in grim silence.]
7:26 [silence]
7:27 " "
7:28 " "
7:29 " "
7:30 " "
7:31 " "
7:32 " "
7:33 So it's reassuring to know, isn't it, that Public Health Scotland can be so confident in the safety of the vaccines.
7:41
[END OF EXCERPT]
Re: Dr John Campbell UK
Date: 2022-11-07 03:40 pm (UTC)Re: Dr John Campbell UK
Date: 2022-11-07 10:04 pm (UTC)In my view, Dr. Campbell is also treading just about the most difficult path imaginable (the razor's edge). It would be a lot easier for him to leave YT in a huff and join the numerous dissident doctors and scientists who are 'preaching to the converted' on other platforms. But what about the masses of people who belong to the 'mushy middle' and may be amenable to the truth if it is presented in a safe and non-confrontational way? To my mind, Campbell is not only brilliant, he is very compassionate. With every video he makes, he is going through a gauntlet of censors who would be more than happy to banish him to YT purgatory. But still he does it. And he has figured out the power of non-verbal communication. While I do not look to him for cutting-edge info, I do watch him from time to time for the sheer pleasure of watching an incredibly kind, caring man do his best to wake up as many people as possible. He was a nurse for most of his professional life; that nurse-like care for others at a very 'human' level shines through his very being. I see him as a beautiful soul and a hero in his own right - perhaps in his own category.
Ron M