Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 181

[ecosophia]

We are now in the fourth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary more than three years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health are anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.

5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Comments

Re: 500 billions for AI, yes billions!

[the_arcane_archivist]

escorcher Please, don't try to diminish it, the thing is really serious, Stargate is really about mRNA, google it out.

My post is really on topic. And I think all this developments confirm my hunch in 2020-2021 that BOVID and waxxine was an AI thing, they really are putin in this kind of money because they think they can make it better!

Customised Cancer Treatment In 48 Hours? Trump’s $500B AI Plan Stargate Sparks Hopes And Debate
https://www.news18.com/world/customised-cancer-treatment-in-48-hours-trumps-500b-ai-plan-stargate-sparks-hopes-and-debate-9197566.html

Re: 500 billions for AI, yes billions!

[escorcher]

I'm not. I didn't mean it either negatively or positively when I said we've opened up into areas I couldn't have anticipated 5 years ago. It just has. It's certainly interesting and the idea of using mRNA jabs to target cancer certainly predates the idea of using them in any viral vaccination programme.
e.g. this:

"In 1996, the first mRNA-based cancer vaccine study tested dendritic cells pulsed with RNA in vitro."
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9512276/

Re: 500 billions for AI, yes billions!

[escorcher]

As regards my comment regards a snake eating a fractal tail, my Dreamwidth icon has been, on occasion, Ouroboros.

Re: 500 billions for AI, yes billions!

[the_arcane_archivist]

"In 1996, the first mRNA-based cancer vaccine study tested dendritic cells pulsed with RNA in vitro."
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9512276/

I know, I work in and out in IT, and I follow the tech scene news since the '90s, these were their two obsessions using coronavirus as a carier for modified mRNA and mRNA therapy. If you search for coronavirus and biotech you go back all the way to the late '90s, early 2000s.

Software is worse and worse and AI also, I really believe they cut a lot of corners in order to be at the forefront. The way Software and Hardware goes lately in US, I think they will lose the supremacy, thus the new handouts. They recieved them first from DOD, contracts to keep the software cloud floating.

Re: 500 billions for AI, yes billions!

[escorcher]

I'm not particularly up on my I.T. but hasn't lazy programming come about as storage sizes have increased (bloating of software) plus the (annoying) idea of rent not own via the cloud? I'm guessing this kind of 'laziness' has partially led to less attention to detail in many sectors, including pharma (e.g. hence the variable quality issue with the vixens). Goes to show sometimes less is more.

JMG is pretty big on the importance of limits - it helps explain the attraction to a limitless consciousness of experiencing limits - adds a whole new unlimited viewpoint! (Yep - fractals creeping in again.)

Re: 500 billions for AI, yes billions!

[the_arcane_archivist]

I worked in and out of IT for almost two decades:
These are I think the most important issues.
- lots and lots of abstraction levels
- cloud is highly centralised in contrast with the decentralised internet ( I mean the network equipment (routers), or P2P (peer to peer protocols).
- software and hardware is lower and lower in quality control. Teams change a lot, a lot of abandoned code, etc
- a lot of garbage out there, even if a system is very good, the quality information it processes is important, GIGO (Garbage In Garbage Out)
- Looks like the world is no longer unified and geopolitical blocks are separating with their stacks, Russia, Iran, China, North Korea, etc, work on their own verticals, thus impending evolution by dispersing focus.