Re: study recomendations

Date: 2025-01-13 11:29 pm (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
Mr. Greer,

1) I understand and agree with your distinction. Since I am, at present, interested in both, I did not originally make such a distinction for the sake of brevity. I also agree that a truly thorough treatment would require two such canon lists. However, I might (again, impertinently) opine that even one mixed (dare we say interdisciplinary?) canon would stand as a one thousand percent improvement over the current state of things.

Shall I take your examples as another example of "genial winks and nods" in occult writing? :)

3) As I said: far, far more inexperienced. I assume these are just what returned on search, and that there's no especial familiarity on your part, even by reputation? Either way, I will consume them dutifully; thank you again for your time.

4) I remember reading here on Dreamwidth that you had sent a translation of Dee off to be published; might we see that this year, or shall we have to wait for next?

Profuse thanks.
(will be screened)
(will be screened)
(will be screened)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
Page generated Jun. 5th, 2025 09:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios