Re: Occult & astrological history, part II

Date: 2024-06-03 08:27 pm (UTC)
From: [personal profile] xcalibur_djs
Yes, that makes more sense, I'd lean towards a descending order (or at least, regular sequences). Venus is the shining one, so that's a different and better interpretation, and as you said, Lemuria was in the tropics, which also fits. The other planets make sense too, especially self-destructive technology and a fading out. We certainly shouldn't ignore Uranus & Neptune (which would be 2 and 1 respectively) -- the ancient astrologers didn't have the benefit of knowing them, but their influences would be there regardless.

One more time:

the Moon -- Polarians (infancy)
Mercury -- Hyperboreans
Venus -- Lemurians (the shining one)
Sun -- Atlanteans (golden zenith)
Mars -- current 5th cycle/Aryans (some might object, but by any name, we're an unruly lot. Mars fits our love of warfare)
Jupiter -- the 6th cycle, yet to come
Saturn -- the 7th cycle, yet to come (limits, longevity, legacy, possible senescence)
Uranus -- the 8th cycle, possibly yet to come (advanced, short-lived, self-destructive)
Neptune -- the 9th cycle, possibly yet to come (gradual fading-out)

Thus, 9876543(21). Alternatively, 6789543(21).

One more thing, an idea popped into my head, that you could describe the civilizational cycles as a day: dawn (Polaris), early morning (Hyperborea), late morning (Lemuria), noon (Atlantis), early afternoon (Aryans/you are here), late afternoon (Jupiter), early evening (Saturn), late evening (Uranus), night (Neptune).
(will be screened)
(will be screened)
(will be screened)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting
Page generated May. 30th, 2025 12:42 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios