Hi Dan, that was a great question and thread. I'd like to add my (late) response.
I was kind of 'prepped' by the Mexican flu hoax in 2009. Back then there was a lot of panicking created in the media. I have a background in statics and like to dig into things. I live in Europe and saw that in Australia (Southern hemisphere so they had this flu 6 months earlier) *less* people had died from the flu than on average. So I wondered why there was so much ado about nothing. I found then that it was because the WHO had declared it a pandemic. So I wondered why the WHO had declared this relative harmless virus to be a pandemic. I found that it was because they changed the definition in such a way that the yearly flu would always fit that particular definition of pandemic. I then looked into why the WHO would do that. I found my answer when I discovered that the WHO is 90% financed by the pharmaceutical industry. Back then I naively expected the truth to come out some day and the perpetrators punished, but of course such a thing never happened.
Fast forward to 2020. Many things are the same this time, down to the detail of the definition-shanenigans of the WHO (this time they changed the definition of 'vaccine'). Just like last time there is a drive to get as many people vaccinated as possible and the WHO is dutifully saying whatever Big Pharma wants it to say. This time the fear factor was pumped up by a factor 10. I'm not sure what was the cause of that, but as on cue many people suddenly seemed especially fearful and when I questioned them I was shouted down.
This was in March 2020 and things were deteriorating fast. I studied the work of Didier Raoult who published promising results with Hydrochloroquine as early treatment. Considering the fact that the disease was only 2 months old he produced solid work, but he was burned in the media where 'experts' demanded double blind studies with multiple year duration. Completely dishonest critiques in other words.
Although I can understand the first lockdown as we didn't know much about the disease, I saw that the second lockdown in September 2020 was not in any way supported by the data. It became clear that the one and only allowed story was that we had to cower inside in fear until our salvation would come in the form of a vaccine.
When I learned that the vaccine used new and untested technology, I knew that I didn't want it. Especially as it was clear thet I don't fall in the group that is of higher risk. In retrospect I believe that the vax campaign should have stopped immediately when dr Byram Bride came out whith proof that the vax spreads all through the body and doesn't stay in the delta muscle. This introduces immense risk, like when the LNP get into non-regenerating cells like heart cells. When the immune system attacks those cells (as it should), it means permanent loss of heart capacity. And this is just one example of what is wrong. dr Bridle came out with the proof late May 2021 and yet the vax still isn't prohibited.
In August 2021 I happened upon mortality statistics of my country. My intuition immediately told me that something was wrong. I spend an evening looking for and analysing data and saw that the baseline mortality had shifted upward since April 2021. That's when I knew something was seriously wrong with the vax. Not much later I found this forum.
Today mortality in the West seems about 10% higher than before Covid (% wise even more in working age people and less in retired people). Live births are 10% lower than before Covid. The past two years these percentages have been quite stable but it gets ever more difficult to find dependable data as the governments do everything they can to muddle the waters. Most people do not want to talk about what happened or where we are now, and there are several other shoes about to drop that are not Covid related. We live in interesting times as they say...
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
Re: The Epiphany (A reflection thread on pandemic choices)
Date: 2023-07-24 07:26 pm (UTC)I was kind of 'prepped' by the Mexican flu hoax in 2009. Back then there was a lot of panicking created in the media. I have a background in statics and like to dig into things. I live in Europe and saw that in Australia (Southern hemisphere so they had this flu 6 months earlier) *less* people had died from the flu than on average. So I wondered why there was so much ado about nothing. I found then that it was because the WHO had declared it a pandemic. So I wondered why the WHO had declared this relative harmless virus to be a pandemic. I found that it was because they changed the definition in such a way that the yearly flu would always fit that particular definition of pandemic. I then looked into why the WHO would do that. I found my answer when I discovered that the WHO is 90% financed by the pharmaceutical industry. Back then I naively expected the truth to come out some day and the perpetrators punished, but of course such a thing never happened.
Fast forward to 2020. Many things are the same this time, down to the detail of the definition-shanenigans of the WHO (this time they changed the definition of 'vaccine'). Just like last time there is a drive to get as many people vaccinated as possible and the WHO is dutifully saying whatever Big Pharma wants it to say. This time the fear factor was pumped up by a factor 10. I'm not sure what was the cause of that, but as on cue many people suddenly seemed especially fearful and when I questioned them I was shouted down.
This was in March 2020 and things were deteriorating fast. I studied the work of Didier Raoult who published promising results with Hydrochloroquine as early treatment. Considering the fact that the disease was only 2 months old he produced solid work, but he was burned in the media where 'experts' demanded double blind studies with multiple year duration. Completely dishonest critiques in other words.
Although I can understand the first lockdown as we didn't know much about the disease, I saw that the second lockdown in September 2020 was not in any way supported by the data. It became clear that the one and only allowed story was that we had to cower inside in fear until our salvation would come in the form of a vaccine.
When I learned that the vaccine used new and untested technology, I knew that I didn't want it. Especially as it was clear thet I don't fall in the group that is of higher risk. In retrospect I believe that the vax campaign should have stopped immediately when dr Byram Bride came out whith proof that the vax spreads all through the body and doesn't stay in the delta muscle. This introduces immense risk, like when the LNP get into non-regenerating cells like heart cells. When the immune system attacks those cells (as it should), it means permanent loss of heart capacity. And this is just one example of what is wrong. dr Bridle came out with the proof late May 2021 and yet the vax still isn't prohibited.
In August 2021 I happened upon mortality statistics of my country. My intuition immediately told me that something was wrong. I spend an evening looking for and analysing data and saw that the baseline mortality had shifted upward since April 2021. That's when I knew something was seriously wrong with the vax. Not much later I found this forum.
Today mortality in the West seems about 10% higher than before Covid (% wise even more in working age people and less in retired people). Live births are 10% lower than before Covid. The past two years these percentages have been quite stable but it gets ever more difficult to find dependable data as the governments do everything they can to muddle the waters. Most people do not want to talk about what happened or where we are now, and there are several other shoes about to drop that are not Covid related. We live in interesting times as they say...