In your Patreon/Subscribestar posts on the Trump inauguration, you discussed the effect of having the inauguration take place on January 20th, when the Sun is in its detriment in Aquarius. Since the President in inauguration charts is represented by the Sun, this means that the President begins his term with a large astrological strike against him.
However, for a short time in 1955 and then again from June 1956 until August 1962, Uranus was in Leo, meaning that the Sun and Uranus were in mutual reception during those years. That would give the Sun the same dignity as if he were in Leo, the sign he rules. There were two inaugurations during this period, Eisenhower's in 1957 and Kennedy's in 1961, in which this was the case - I verified this by generating the charts for Inauguration Day for those years. Since Eisenhower had two terms and his first term began in 1953 when the Sun and Uranus weren't in mutual reception, if the charts for the two inaugurations were otherwise the same (which they weren't, of course), my hypothesis would be that Eisenhower's second term would have been more successful than his first term. Have you taken a look at the charts for these two inaugurations? They might make an interesting test case for the effects of having inaugurations take place when the Sun is in detriment.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
Inaugurations when the Sun and Uranus were in mutual reception
Date: 2025-01-13 08:59 pm (UTC)However, for a short time in 1955 and then again from June 1956 until August 1962, Uranus was in Leo, meaning that the Sun and Uranus were in mutual reception during those years. That would give the Sun the same dignity as if he were in Leo, the sign he rules. There were two inaugurations during this period, Eisenhower's in 1957 and Kennedy's in 1961, in which this was the case - I verified this by generating the charts for Inauguration Day for those years. Since Eisenhower had two terms and his first term began in 1953 when the Sun and Uranus weren't in mutual reception, if the charts for the two inaugurations were otherwise the same (which they weren't, of course), my hypothesis would be that Eisenhower's second term would have been more successful than his first term. Have you taken a look at the charts for these two inaugurations? They might make an interesting test case for the effects of having inaugurations take place when the Sun is in detriment.