ecosophia: (Default)
John Michael Greer ([personal profile] ecosophia) wrote2025-05-27 03:01 pm

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 199

remember thisWe are now in the fourth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary more than three years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health are anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.


5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.


With that said, the floor is open for discussion. 
the_arcane_archivist: (Default)

[personal profile] the_arcane_archivist 2025-05-27 07:14 pm (UTC)(link)
Meanwhile the Stargate is being built
https://archive.is/7rTM2


The "science" of the mRNA is patiently hammered in place:
https://archive.is/Xi5ng

(Anonymous) 2025-05-27 08:30 pm (UTC)(link)
The next time they run the hoax the ai video will be good enough to show people collapsing in the streets. The only way to tell the difference is to go to the hospital and see for yourself what’s going on.

KVD

(no subject)

[personal profile] the_arcane_archivist - 2025-05-28 05:11 (UTC) - Expand

Hospitals

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-28 23:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Hospitals

[personal profile] thinking_turtle - 2025-05-29 10:25 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-27 21:02 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] the_arcane_archivist - 2025-05-28 05:13 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2025-05-27 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
FDA picks a new strain for fall Covid vaccines. Here's what it means for your next shot.
The agency said it would prefer drugmakers to update their Covid vaccines to the LP.8.1 strain, a move that would likely limit access to the shots.

https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/fda-picks-new-strain-fall-covid-vaccines-means-shot-rcna208726

'for your next shot' is what stands out to me..
ysabetwordsmith: Cartoon of me in Wordsmith persona (Default)

Yes ...

[personal profile] ysabetwordsmith 2025-05-27 09:30 pm (UTC)(link)
That last line is standard propaganda:

* The use of "your" presupposes purchase, thus trying to move the decision out of the consumer's hands.

* The use of "next" presupposes prior purchase(s).

It always makes me angry when I see medical propaganda signs, and they're just everywhere.

Re: Yes ...

[personal profile] tritumi - 2025-05-28 11:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Yes ...

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-28 20:47 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-28 19:06 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-06-01 22:32 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-28 19:08 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-28 20:57 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 15:29 (UTC) - Expand

New protocols

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-28 23:21 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2025-05-27 07:18 pm (UTC)(link)
China steps into gap left by US to donate $500m to WHO

https://www.msn.com/en-xl/politics/government/china-steps-into-gap-left-by-us-to-donate-500m-to-who/ar-AA1Frwcc

I don't understand why they would want to do this..
it will only prop up the WHO.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-27 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
"It will only prop up the WHO"...

yes:

https://nguyenthaihocfoundations.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Tedros_shakedhand_Xi_Jinping_Jan282020a-1.jpg

- Cicada Grove

(no subject)

[personal profile] the_arcane_archivist - 2025-05-28 06:03 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-28 09:11 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-30 14:28 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Approaching Hiatus

(Anonymous) 2025-05-28 01:12 am (UTC)(link)
That's reassuring, come to think of it.

(If it weren't the case, then I'd start to wonder if you'd been seduced into becoming a member of the "laptop class." 😉)

Have a wonderful trip, JMG.

*Ochre Harebrained Curmudgeon*

Re: Approaching Hiatus

[personal profile] tritumi - 2025-05-28 11:34 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Approaching Hiatus

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-29 22:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Approaching Hiatus

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-28 22:54 (UTC) - Expand

Anatomy of the sinister Covid project: Norman Fenton interviews Paula Jardine

(Anonymous) 2025-05-27 09:39 pm (UTC)(link)
It looks like Youtube are suppressing this video but I found it via a link from the same interview on Rumble. I am posting it here as someone in the previous Covid thread said it was paywalled.

Anatomy of the sinister Covid project: Norman Fenton interviews Paula Jardine -

Description: In the last three years Paula Jardine has carried out a forensic historical analysis of how and why we got to where we are now with the covid ‘pandemic’ and the drive for universal vaccination. This includes how the World War 2 Manhatten project evolved into Operation Warpspeed to produce the covid mRNA vaccines.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EDpgDqh1_X8&t=17s

https://rumble.com/v3szuty-anatomy-of-the-sinister-covid-project-norman-fenton-interviews-paula-jardin.html

Also found an expose of the Means siblings

The Means Psy-Op, Continued
Additional clues that Casey and Calley Means derive their political influence from sources everyone is trying to hide.

https://debbielerman.substack.com/p/the-means-psy-op-continued

Re: Anatomy of the sinister Covid project: Norman Fenton interviews Paula Jardine

(Anonymous) 2025-05-28 09:03 pm (UTC)(link)
Hi Anonymous, thanks very much for this.

Speaking of the history of the covid catastrophe, Leslie Manookian (she of getting-masks-off-airplane-travelers heroic lawsuit) has posted a very useful and well-researched time line in 2 parts:

https://lesliemanookian.substack.com/p/timeline-to-covid-tyranny-part-one
https://lesliemanookian.substack.com/p/timeline-to-covid-tyranny-part-two

Media Hype

[personal profile] peter_van_erp 2025-05-27 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I've seen a flurry of reports in the MSM (NPR, local newspaper) about a NEW COVID 19 STRAIN!! I suppose Pfizer must be oversupplied with the Vax, and need to move product.
Sorry, no thanks.
jenniferkobernik: (Default)

[personal profile] jenniferkobernik 2025-05-27 11:42 pm (UTC)(link)
https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2022-01-10/why-shouldnt-we-dance-on-the-graves-of-anti-vaxxers

The article referenced in this week’s meme.

I am amazed, after reading such a shallow hodgepodge of logical fallacy and oblivious self-congratulation, to note that the author is apparently a recipient of the Pulitzer Prize.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-28 08:42 am (UTC)(link)
and the URL, geeze, the URL, "why shouldn't we dance on the graves of anti-vaxxers". But of course!

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-29 01:37 (UTC) - Expand

Re: deranged - that's the way it was

(Anonymous) - 2025-06-01 22:36 (UTC) - Expand
seanbolger1: (Default)

Re: On Topic, Please

[personal profile] seanbolger1 2025-05-28 03:35 pm (UTC)(link)
Take some herbs with you to England, a lot of people are suddenly coming down with a really bad chest infection that last about 5 days, with 2 of those bedridden.
Kind regards
Sean Bolger

Re: On Topic, Please

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-28 18:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: On Topic, Please

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-28 20:11 (UTC) - Expand

Re: On Topic, Please

[personal profile] boccaccio - 2025-05-29 06:53 (UTC) - Expand

Re: On Topic, Please

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-30 17:29 (UTC) - Expand

Re: On Topic, Please

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-29 07:05 (UTC) - Expand

Re: On Topic, Please

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-29 11:23 (UTC) - Expand

Re: On Topic, Please

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-30 02:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: On Topic, Please

[personal profile] seanbolger1 - 2025-05-29 07:16 (UTC) - Expand

Re: On Topic, Please

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 11:59 (UTC) - Expand

Re: On Topic, Please

(Anonymous) - 2025-06-01 06:58 (UTC) - Expand

Re: On Topic, Please

[personal profile] mistyfriday - 2025-05-28 22:29 (UTC) - Expand

Thank you

(Anonymous) 2025-05-28 01:20 am (UTC)(link)
Week 199

Thank you, JMG, and thank you, forumistas.

JMG, may your travels this month be most wonderful and rewarding!

A note on this week's meme. The article in the Los Angeles Time with that ghastly title was by business columnist Michael Hiltzic. The person in the photograph is not the author, but Kelly Ernby, described by the LA Times as an "Orange County GOP figure" (GOP or Grand Old Party refers to the Republic Party) who died "after disparaging anti-pandemic measures."

From Kelly Ernby's obituary in the Orange County Register:

"She commented most frequently on Twitter over the past year about her opposition to mandates for COVID-19 vaccines. During a Dec. 4 rally against vaccine mandates at Irvine City Hall, Cal State Fullerton’s Daily Titan reports Ernby drew parallels between the 1960s and today, saying in both eras people faced losing freedoms to what she termed socialist ideals.

“There’s nothing that matters more than our freedoms right now,” she said, according to the Daily Titan.

Ernby had filed to run for Assembly again in the 74th District, but that was before the redistricting commission drew her out of that seat. She was widely expected to announce soon that she’d be running in the newly drawn coastal 72nd District, where she’d again face off against Dixon.

Ernby is survived by her husband, Axel."

You can read her obituary in its entirety here:
https://www.ocregister.com/2022/01/03/kelly-ernby-deputy-da-and-former-assembly-candidate-has-died-of-covid-19-complications/

The news of Erby's death made not only the LA Times but People Magazine and even international news, for example:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10371785/Husband-anti-vax-mandate-California-Deputy-DA-46-died-COVID-says-wasnt-vaccinated.html

Clearly those behind the vaccination campaign found the death of a photogenic Republican critic of the mandates a valuable story to be promoting. But here we are in 2025... I know a few things now, like what happened to the people who ended up in the hospital wth any respiratory distress at all— or any positive covid test, no matter what their symptoms— how they were isolated from their families and subjected to other covid protocols such as unusual and heavy sedation, ventilation, no testing nor antibiotics for pneumonia, but plenty of kidney-killing doses of the EUA drug Remdesivir. And also suffered neglect including dehydration and starvation. Sounds like a bad movie—- and at the time, I wouldn't have believed it. But I know now that many people fell into this killing trap in the hospitals.

Maybe I missed it but in all the several reports of Ernby's death that I looked at none mentioned her going to the hospital. They simply state that she died "suddenly" of "complications from covid." That journalists had ceased asking the most basic questions— well, early on, there you have it.

But you know what, I think it's highly likely that she did go to the hospital, and there she would have been separated from her husband, put in a room and left alone, sedated, ventilated, and dosed with Remdesvir. I do not know that that happened to her, but I know now that that happened to so many people that I would be surprised if her story were substantially different.

For anyone reading this who isn't familiar with the covid hospital horror stories, this is a good place to start learning:
Polly Tommey's interview with Carolyn [CC] Blakeman, "Hospital Protocol: 25 Commonalities"
February 2, 2024
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/events/25-commonalities/hopsital-protocol-25-commonalities/


Cestiosaurus

Re: Thank you

(Anonymous) 2025-05-29 04:42 am (UTC)(link)
Thank you very much for this clarification.
The woman in the picture is not the creator of the meme, but its victim.

- Cicada Grove

A post lockdown tale

(Anonymous) 2025-05-28 01:54 am (UTC)(link)
We met Francis O'Neill a few weeks back with his harrowing adventure of trying to catch a bus in https://francisoneill.substack.com/p/a-lockdown-tale.

Now, we have another piece by Francis on the post-lockdown world: https://francisoneill.substack.com/p/a-post-lockdown-tale

where we encounter such gems as "I was firmly on Klaus Schwab's designated trajectory of, "owning nothing and being happy," only the latter of which would constitute a significant change for me."
the_arcane_archivist: (Default)

Repression and censorship never works against karma

[personal profile] the_arcane_archivist 2025-05-28 05:54 am (UTC)(link)

Repression and censorship never works against karma, karma will still have its effects regardless if people know or not about the truth.


The AI only hides the truth, it cannot alter the karma, actually one ca argue that AI makes it worse because the system cannot adapt to reality, and to a new energy level.



[personal profile] anonymoose_canadian 2025-05-28 01:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I am fairly confident that where I am is heavily vaxed. The talk of fertility issues made me think about the fact it has now been close to a year since I I noticed I have not seen a baby in a very long time. I walk and bus a lot, and so I am out in public quite a bit; and just under a year ago now I noticed that I hadn't seen a baby in a while. I wrote it down as odd and didn't think much of it, until the discussion of fertility declines recently; and I still have not seen a baby anywhere. There are plenty of toddlers and little kids; but even the toddlers are starting to get scarce now, as they grow up.

This is exactly what I'd expect to see if there really is a massive fertility crisis, and so my assessment of the likelihood of serious issues has gone up since I made the connection. Has anyone else noticed a lack of babies where they live?

(Anonymous) 2025-05-28 07:10 pm (UTC)(link)
I live outside of a town I sometimes affectionately refer to as Mormonville, and am happy to report that babies are still quite common, including to women I know to be vaxxed, although there seems to be a connection between vaxxes and high risk pregnancies, it could be an illusion due to people who talk about their health to everyone being people who talk about their health to everyone.

Two points: Idaho was low on vax taking (as it has been since the failure of the polio vax decades ago) and those who did take the vax are generally older.

The vaxxed moms with high risk pregnancies appear to have babies with no problems other than those due to the pregnacy complications.

BoysMom

(no subject)

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-28 22:09 (UTC) - Expand

Missing babies

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-29 09:58 (UTC) - Expand

Yesterday

[personal profile] boccaccio 2025-05-29 07:09 am (UTC)(link)
I went to my barber yesterday. While waiting for my turn, I read the local newspaper of my 50k town. Every 4 years the municipality holds a large poll among the inhabitants. The results of 2025 were in. In my country, the Netherlands, we have the concept of "mantelzorger". A mantelzorger is someone who provides unpaid and long term care for ill family members or friends. In 2021 17% of the inhabitants reported to be a mantelzorger. In 2025 the percentage is 30%.

When the barber washed my hair, out of nowhere she said:"So many of my customers are very sick or dead. It makes me depressed. Many lung cancers. I want it to stop"

When walking back I passed a house whith the frontdoor half open. From the inside I heard people screaming and arguing. In the meantime I have a few of the best weeks in years. More clarity, energy and effectiveness than I can remember. My little vegetable garden is doing fine too. The zucchini is growing, the pumpkin is staging, the tomatos are clamoring for a warm, sunny summer and the strawberries are almost ripe. Too bad I will be in England when the're ready to pluck but the birds will enjoy.

Re: Yesterday

(Anonymous) 2025-05-30 11:54 am (UTC)(link)
boccaccio, thanks for this report. That's a new word for me, "mantelzorger." Perhaps we should adopt it into the English language. I would think that the closest we have in English would be "caregiver," but it's not so specific.

Cetiosaurus

Re: Yesterday

[personal profile] stubborn_ass - 2025-05-31 15:20 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Yesterday

(Anonymous) - 2025-06-01 23:41 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2025-05-29 09:54 am (UTC)(link)
So... in the slow, slow, oh so very, very, very slow train wreck of the covidian catastrophe, chapter XXXVIII, in which no one with any savvy is holding their breath, some names are out now, and I do think that ball is rolling towards a sticky wicket of serious consequences.

This link is to Dr. McCullough's substack - FOCAL POINTS - a report (of a report of a report) about those named in the recent Senate hearings for having covered up the explosion of myocarditis in the wake of the jabs roll out.

https://www.thefocalpoints.com/p/government-officials-named-in-covid

What is ever so peculiar to me is that these major stories do not appear in the mainstream media, or if so, then twisted beyond recognition, and so they're difficult to identify, never mind follow up on. Various substacks, such as Focal Points, are a big help, but it's still a very chaotic and shadowy information-scape out there.



(Anonymous) 2025-05-29 03:50 pm (UTC)(link)
COVID shot is safe during pregnancy, Canadian doctors say after U.S. move

https://globalnews.ca/news/11201995/covid-vaccine-pregnancy-safety-rfk-jr-us-canada/

i think this is terrible.

(Anonymous) 2025-05-30 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
"We must all hang together or we shall hang separately"

(Anonymous) 2025-05-29 04:15 pm (UTC)(link)
HHS slams 'under-tested' mRNA technology as Trump cuts Moderna's vaccine funding
The decision follows HHS's removal of COVID vaccines from federal vaccine recommendations for children and pregnant women

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/hhs-slams-under-tested-mrna-technology-trump-cuts-modernas-vaccine-funding

it should be removed altogether..

(Anonymous) 2025-05-30 12:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Only 'healthy' pregnant women and children: still on the menu for the 'vulnerable'.

I would call it throwing bones to the dogs under the table, but bones are good things to dogs, unlike this hypocritical rubbish from the three stooges!

(Anonymous) 2025-05-29 09:02 pm (UTC)(link)
CVS Closing 270 Stores Nationwide: List of Locations Impacted

https://www.newsweek.com/cvs-closing-270-stores-locations-impacted-2077982

more downsizing

(Anonymous) 2025-05-30 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
Health Secretary Says Government Plans To Launch New Medical Journals

“We’re going to publish the peer review for the first time. We’re probably going to stop publishing in The Lancet, New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA, and those other journals because they’re all corrupt.”

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/health-secretary-says-government-plans-launch-new-medical-journals

maybe we will begin to get some truth in medical journals now..?

Riding the waves of deception

(Anonymous) 2025-05-31 12:33 am (UTC)(link)
In https://miri.substack.com/p/riding-the-waves-of-deception, Miri Anne Finch presents the mechanics of propaganda and how it is used to smooth the way for the agenda du jour beginning with a long-running and highly promoted kidnapping story in the UK.

"...when the Madeleine McCann story first hit the headlines, there were two narratives surrounding it:

1) The official story: Madeleine was abducted by a predator, just as her parents said.
2) The official conspiracy theory: Madeleine was not abducted, her parents killed her and invented the abduction story to cover it up.

However, nobody at that time that I am aware of suggested a third option: that Madeleine was neither abducted nor killed, but rather, the whole story was a staged, special ops intelligence production, performed by crisis actors in order to propagandise the public (which, as regular readers know, is the conclusion I've come to about the Madeleine McCann case)."

...

"This third option has developed, because, over the years, it has become increasingly apparent that most major media events have two controlled narratives that run simultaneously:

1) The official story (for instance, Covid is a terrifying deadly plague originating from bats) and;
2) The official conspiracy theory (Covid is a lab leak from China).

The establishment controls both of these scripts, with its overt assets such as TV newscasters and politicians pushing the former narrative. Simultaneously, its controlled opposition agents, like high-profile "alternative" journalists and podcasters, push the latter.

We the audience, meanwhile, are just supposed to argue endlessly about 1) and 2), therefore keeping us firmly distracted from 3) - the actual truth (as per "the pandemic", that there was no Covid)."

...

"...upon closer inspection, it tends to become very quickly apparent that many/most high-profile media events are, in fact, not real, and have, to greater or lesser extents, been staged. Sometimes acted out using real people, sometimes dispensing with real people and using AI. Do real people sometimes get hurt? Yes, real people do sometimes get hurt on movie sets (hence why high-profile actors will use stunt doubles, to minimise the risk of harm to themselves). They're still movie sets, though.

These events are staged by the establishment in order to push certain political agendas, and to manufacture the consent of the public for what the overlords want. We can be sure about that, because these dramatic, high-octane events always just so happen to coalesce with an agenda the overlords are trying to push.

The Liverpool car attack, for instance, dovetails precisely with the war on cars, and cars as "lethal weapons". "It's not safe to have them on out streets, we need a lot more restrictions on private vehicle ownership, and eventually, an outright ban altogether!"

the_arcane_archivist: (Default)

Re: Riding the waves of deception

[personal profile] the_arcane_archivist 2025-05-31 08:10 am (UTC)(link)
I noticed this almost 15 years ago, and also reported here on the open thread.

There are two alternatives made up, with details so unclear as two make the differences between the two versions very volatile, so much that people fall into one of the two categories almost randomly. It is some sort of narrative illusion, if it's based on a real case at some point is not even relevant. As the adage goes, "Never let a good crisis go to waste."

The narrative is made up by spin artists as you said, but the details are crafted so that it polarizes the option based on perception defect. What is crucial to the narrative as to have very few cues, that are hammered continuously.

The most clear examples are the optical illusions that polarizes two options, and make the other side think that: how can they see that version because it's obviously this version.

Best examples are, spinning ballerina, some people randomly see it spinning from left to right, others in the other way:



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinning_dancer


The illusion derives from the lack of visual cues for depth. For instance, as the dancer's arms move from viewer's left to right, it is possible to view her arms passing between her body and the viewer (that is, in the foreground of the picture, in which case she would be circling counterclockwise on her right foot) and it is also possible to view her arms as passing behind the dancer's body (that is, in the background of the picture, in which case she is seen circling clockwise on her left foot).


or this dress that some people see as blue and black, and some as gold and white:


https://www.theguardian.com/technology/blog/2015/feb/27/science-thedress-colour-illusion-the-dress-blue-black-gold-white



The internet is now made up by people firmly in two camps: the white and gold, and the blue and black – with each thinking the other is completely wrong.

But Ron Chrisley, director of the Centre for Research in Cognitive Science at the University of Sussex, believes that the problem mainly lies in the fact that everyone has forgotten we are dealing with an illusion.

Re: Riding the waves of deception

(Anonymous) - 2025-06-02 20:42 (UTC) - Expand

Re: Riding the waves of deception

(Anonymous) - 2025-05-31 08:41 (UTC) - Expand

(Anonymous) 2025-05-31 12:12 pm (UTC)(link)
Meet the Bureaucrats Who Hid Data About Heart Damage from the mRNA COVID Vaccines

https://dailyclout.io/meet-the-bureaucrats-who-hid-data-about-heart-damage-from-the-mrna-covid-vaccines/

from naomi wolf's site
frittermywig: Original Illustration by Henry Holiday (Default)

Daniel Polikoff

[personal profile] frittermywig 2025-06-01 02:36 am (UTC)(link)
Just learned the name 'Daniel Polikoff' and wanted to mention him here. He's the author of the 2024 book "Reset or Renaissance: Life, Liberty, and the Quest for Enlightenment in a Post-Covid World" which is the first (and so far only) volume of a series called "An American Scholar's Covid Chronicle." He's also a Rilke and Jung scholar, a Waldorf teacher, a translator of Grail literature, and he devised the Western Esotericism curriculum at Kosmos Institute.

I heard him on The Regeneration Podcast from The Center for Sophiological Studies, and it was a great conversation. Would be of interest to many Ecosophians, I think.

(And bon voyage, JMG!)

Re: Daniel Polikoff

(Anonymous) 2025-06-01 11:51 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks, frittermywig, this looks fascinating.

(Anonymous) 2025-06-01 06:55 am (UTC)(link)
Finally some good news from Murder-na -

"We announced today that the U.S. FDA has approved mNEXSPIKE®, a new vaccine against COVID-19, for use in all adults 65 and older, as well as individuals aged 12 years through 64 years of age with at least one underlying condition that puts them at high risk for severe outcomes from COVID-19."

Stephen Bancel

https://x.com/moderna_tx/status/1928679207304892466

(Anonymous) 2025-06-02 09:39 am (UTC)(link)
The Australian government recently released a report comparing outcomes between covid cases for the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated, and (surprise, surprise) finds the vaccinated had better outcomes:

https://news.rebekahbarnett.com.au/p/useless-covid-data-analysis-riddled

The substack article does a good job exposing the statistical manipulation that went into the report.

But, there is a point being missed here.

There were some major doomsday predictions that were used to justify the lockdowns and mass vaccinations: that covid had a 3% fatality rate, that people had a very high chance of becoming seriously ill, that they had a good chance of ending up on a ventilator, that the hospitals would be swamped with thousands of patients.

There is actually no need to do a deep dive into the stats and compare the vaxxed to the unvaxxed. The only question that needs to be asked is if these apocalyptic doomsday predictions came true for the unvaxxed. And of course there is zero evidence that this happened. This is the point that really needs to be hammered.

With reports like this, the government is now arguing that the lockdowns and forced vaccines were legitimate (based on percentage differences between the vaxxed and unvaxxed), when these extremist measures were initially justified by a doomsday narrative about a virus that would make a large part of the population seriously ill.

It could be proven that the vaxxed had better outcomes (statistically) than the unvaxxed, but this would still not justify the covid tyranny.

(Anonymous) 2025-06-02 05:07 pm (UTC)(link)
They are crafting the statistics to support their desired outcome. Of course they would ignore the obvious factors, as they would not provide the statistical outcome they desire.

Caldathras

(Anonymous) 2025-06-02 08:40 pm (UTC)(link)
“Moderna’s New COVID Shot Approved After Trial—But Skips Placebo Testing”

https://dailyclout.io/modernas-new-covid-shot-approved-after-trial-but-skips-placebo-testing/

i do not understand what rfkjr and all of them are doing
the ppl who supported him are not happy..
the_arcane_archivist: (Default)

[personal profile] the_arcane_archivist 2025-06-03 05:08 am (UTC)(link)
i do not understand what rfkjr and all of them are doing
the ppl who supported him are not happy..


I had my doubts in MAHA, the doubts were clear when Trump approved the 500 billion aid for the Stargate, having the narcissist boss from Oracle making the cancer "healing" mRNA tumorshot makes me extremely uncomfortable.

That's why I though RFKjr is either a Pied Piper or someone good that will have to give up at some point or even be replaced if it swims against the stream. And he will not be the only dissappointment of the administration. The honeymoon is over, a lot of things are not showing up but it seems the mRNA Cancer shot "Stargate" is proceeding very fast:

https://www.costar.com/article/1387166843/first-stargate-data-center-project-lands-71-billion-construction-loan



(no subject)

[personal profile] weilong - 2025-06-03 21:32 (UTC) - Expand

Page 1 of 2