ecosophia | Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 198

We are now in the fourth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary more than three years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health are anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; ~~public health authorities~~ government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.

3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue.

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.

5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I wonder if it makes sense to view the mRna technology as a form of chemical AI introduced into the body. I mean artificial intelligence in a broad sense, not in the narrow LLM sense.

I think that is more than just an analogy.

In the broad sense, your point is perfectly valid. Given that mRNA tech itself is problematic it functions as a filtering system to impose eugenics upon the species. This is lkely both targeted and randomized. It is targeted insofar as there is a population for whom mRNA components are predictably deadly in near and midterm durations. It is randomized insofar as these same deadly components create the mortal or debilitating conditions in unpredictable ways.

Consequently, the species is force-adapted to the tech and those who cannot adapt are filtered out, eliminated over time.

mRNA is only the package of course. The contents introduce a further complication which, as with the spike protein and other aspects of the jab, have force adaption epigenetic principles embedded with accompanying disagreeable outcomes, either intended or not.

And, needless to say, there is interaction between the metabolic transformations induced by the package and the contents to initiate a third sort of species altering dynamic.

All in all, we are off to the future.

Let's say they were/are messing with things they understand just enough to make themselves dangerous to themselves and everyone around them.

One can only hope they can get past that understanding just enough to be dangerous phase without killing off most of humanity.

I've thought about AI in relation to the mrna jabs but slightly differently. I wondered in the damage to fertility could be the effect of using AI to design biochemicals. It's obvious to me that 'sterilizing vacvine' in the sense of preventing infection and spread of yhd coronavirus is one thing and 'sterilizing vaccine' as in one that interrupts human fertility are very different things but it's exactly the kind if thing that is conflated by the big language models. Did the product get tweaked with features from the wrong definition for example from features that reduced fertility in lab animals? Maybe because bioweapons labs had earlier versions of the language models than those available to the public? I doubt there's a way to find out.

But yes, to your original point too, the stabilised mrna is a kind of foreign driving force in whatever cells it co-opts to translate itself

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 198

mRna as AI?

Re: mRna as AI?

Re: mRna as AI?

Re: mRna as AI?