ecosophia: (Default)
John Michael Greer ([personal profile] ecosophia) wrote2025-04-29 10:22 am

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 195

how it startedWe are now in the fourth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary more than three years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health are anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.


5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.


With that said, the floor is open for discussion. 

Re: Anecdata

(Anonymous) 2025-04-29 07:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm seeing rumors that real estate listing numbers are being gamed. This might obscure the picture, at least if you are looking at homes-for-sale as an indicator.

Re: Anecdata

(Anonymous) 2025-04-30 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
That wouldn't surprise me one bit.
I'm quite sure real estate, period, is being gamed.

- Cicada Grove
methylethyl: (Default)

Re: Anecdata

[personal profile] methylethyl 2025-05-01 06:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Yeah. I think the bubble is finally starting to pop, and there are a LOT of vested interests involved who would very much like it to NOT look like that is what is happening, at least until they can get their money out of it.

Prices are starting to falter in my area (I keep close tabs on this, as we've been failing to buy a house for like four years now), number of houses-for-sale, number of things sitting on the market and then having price reductions, is going up. I've seen some people who are watching the MLS listings directly, saying that weird patterns are emerging in number-of-listings in dicey overinflated markets like Phoenix, where listings numbers, on weekends, are dropping by nice round multiples-of-100 type amounts, then gradually drifting back up, which means either some hanky-panky is happening to try and obscure the actual sharply-rising number of unsold listings, OR (less likely, but not impossible?) some large entity is bulk-buying weirdly even numbers of houses all at once, on Fridays.
methylethyl: (Default)

Re: Anecdata

[personal profile] methylethyl 2025-05-01 06:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Totally apart from all the obvious fraud in that market, the boomers are the big homeowners, and they are dying off (assisted by the ESGs no doubt). A lot of the market inflation sort of counted on them staying in their oversized suburban houses forever. Bound to be some scrambling to hide that inconvenient fact, by people heavily invested in the whole houses-appreciate-forever myth. Expecting aggressive data fraud.

That said, we now have some experience with the patterns and perils of data fraud... if that's taught us anything, it's that you can hide the direct, naked numbers like death stats and cause-of-death data, but you can't fake everything all at once and the reality leaks out in weird places, like insurance companies and cell phone data, utility company usage, that sort of thing.

So what interesting datasets might help us poke at the real numbers of empty houses, if MLS is gaming the numbers?