ecosophia: (Default)
John Michael Greer ([personal profile] ecosophia) wrote2025-02-25 10:46 am

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 186

some successWe are now in the fourth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary more than three years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health are anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.


5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.


With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Spike injury by shedding?

(Anonymous) 2025-02-27 02:37 am (UTC)(link)
Does anyone know of information about injuries from the spike protein to people who are unquaxxinated, but who have been exposed to the spike protein via contact with those who have been quaxxinated? I gather the spike is exhaled by the latter for some weeks after the quaxx.

Re: Spike injury by shedding?

[personal profile] fredsmith11 2025-02-27 03:53 am (UTC)(link)
I get strange headaches on extended public transport trips around Sydney. Always just above the eyes. Otherwise I never get them. No proof, but I assume it's from shedding.

Last week a whole bunch of people got on a previously almost empty train, some of them masked, so thus safe to assume they're jabbed and the headache started a few minutes later.

I use a Bob Beck micropulser, which uses electrical pulses to dispose of parasites in the blood (that's what it is claimed to do anyway) to get rid of the headaches. It always works. Again, I have no proof, but I assume it zaps whatever it is people are shedding e.g. nanotech as well as spike?

Note: There are plenty of videos demonstrating various parasites in the jab. Again, no proof as I don't own a dark field microscope, but I saw enough to take it as credible.

Here's a video showing nanobots in action: https://www.facebook.com/reel/611390748063996 .

Search "vaccine nanotech" on bitchute and you'll get a ton of videos.

Re: Spike injury by shedding?

[personal profile] boccaccio 2025-02-27 04:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for the tip about the micropulser. Sometimes I feel a bit feverish after spending time with certain vaxxed persons. I'll try the micropulsing to see if it helps!

Re: Spike injury by shedding?

[personal profile] boccaccio 2025-02-27 04:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Midwestern Doctor and Pier Kory have written several long posts on their Substacks about shedding including many compelling examples. For example https://pierrekorymedicalmusings.com/p/shedding-part-6-clinical-case-notes and https://www.midwesterndoctor.com/p/covid-19-vaccine-shedding-experiences

Since late last year we also have scientific proof of shedding. We had an in-dephth discussion on it in this thread https://ecosophia.dreamwidth.org/306862.html?thread=52692910#cmt52692910

Not sure if you want to hear this, but the virus can also cause similar pathologies as the vaccine. They both produce spike in the body so it shouldn't be a big surprise. I know people who got long covid before the vaccines were rolled out and you can find many stories on X that are as horrible as those of the vaccine damaged ones.
scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)

Re: Spike injury by shedding?

[personal profile] scotlyn 2025-02-28 09:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Just to say that I posted a link here -
https://ecosophia.dreamwidth.org/317254.html?thread=54162502#cmt54162502 -
to an FDA industry guidance document, dated Aug 2015, on the topic of "shedding" (as distinct from "biological distribution"), titled "Design and Analysis of Shedding Studies for Virus or Bacteria Based Gene Therapy and Oncolytic Products".

It does not seem the FDA holds any doubts that shedding is real.