Entry tags:
Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 66

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:
1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.
2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue.
4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religious, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.
With that said, the floor is open for discussion.
Re: Jessica Rose, Australia Births Numbers
(Anonymous) 2022-11-14 11:59 pm (UTC)(link)https://jessicar.substack.com/p/update-on-whats-going-on-with-births
It is, in fact data lag. The question is though, why such a profound lag? Are they trying to slow roll the data release for any reason in particular?
Re: Jessica Rose, Australia Births Numbers
Re: Jessica Rose, Australia Births Numbers
E.g. here's the latest data from the UK: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/livebirths/bulletins/birthsummarytablesenglandandwales/2021
"There were 624,828 live births in England and Wales in 2021, an increase of 1.8% from 613,936 in 2020, but still below the 2019 figure (640,370); 2021 remains in line with the long-term trend of decreasing live births seen before the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic."
That passing mention of "the long-term trend of decreasing live births" is a reference to the demographic timebomb facing most developed countries.
Re: Jessica Rose, Australia Births Numbers
(Anonymous) 2022-11-15 09:19 am (UTC)(link)If I had to guess, I'd say the star performers from the Births Branch have been poached to help deal with a sudden glut of certificates in another branch.
It's one agency, and it only has three subject areas to produce certificates for, so. . .
Hmmmm, I think I'll just leave it at that and let everyone do the kind of math that you don't need a chart for.
The Ninth Mouse