Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 66

[ecosophia]

As we proceed through the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselesness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries. 

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religious, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.     

Comments

[(Anonymous)]

Isn't the Sikh faith a hybrid of Islam and Hinduism? That one seems to be flourishing.

[(Anonymous)]

Sikhism was not manufactured in a ham-fisted way by an egomaniac emperor. Its founder, Guru Nanak (1469-1539), was a wise and deeply spiritual man who never identified as either Hindu or Muslim, as were the nine gurus who proceeded after him ending in Guru Gobind Singh (1666-1708). While it has elements of both Hinduism and Islam, the Sikh religion has quite a few tenets and practices that are unique to Sikhism (for example, the "five Ks") that fit perfectly with the martial culture of the Punjabi people of the period. The religion is one with the people's culture and the land from which it sprang.

Religions have borrowed from other religions since the beginning of time (for example, the influence of Zoroastrianism on Judaism and the many elements of the Sabian religion that are found in Islam): it is how those borrowings are used and adapted to fit the deep (often unarticulated) needs of the people that makes all the difference. The same can be said of the pseudo-religions or religion substitutes (scientific materialism, Marxism and the latest manifestations of fascism), I suppose.

Ron M