Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 66

[ecosophia]

As we proceed through the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselesness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries. 

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religious, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.     

Comments

Re: Sir Christopher Chope, MP for Christchurch, UK

[(Anonymous)]

Dr. Campbell says that the film cited at the end is no longer available on that platform. (He didn't even dare to name it himself!)

-Translucent Jejune Octopus

Re: Sir Christopher Chope, MP for Christchurch, UK

[(Anonymous)]

That's no surprise! No worries, it can be viewed at this link:

https://www.oraclefilms.com/safeandeffective

That webpage notes:
"The documentary was removed from YouTube on 26th October 2022 under the pretext of alleged "medical misinformation". At that time it had accumulated over 990,000 views and 7,000 comments."

Funny, I have just been transcribing an excerpt from an interview in which RFK Jr talks about the meaning of "misinformation."


PS
Rumble has it:
https://rumble.com/v1lwbgs-safe-and-effective-a-second-opinion-2022-oracle-films-news-uncut.html

and BitChute:
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2t5lPLsqgD99/

Re: Sir Christopher Chope, MP for Christchurch, UK

[tritumi]

Dr Campbell has decided to walk a fine line himself. The balancing act requires a verbal shtick that is likely to shred itself.

His pretend act is not sustainable,

Re: Sir Christopher Chope, MP for Christchurch, UK

[(Anonymous)]

And this is really interesting— I mean, at what point is it deermined by an algo, and/or in some cases, an actual person who makes the determination to kick someone off YT, or take down an individual video?

By the way, I myself have had 3 things taken down from my old Google blogger blog, none of which had anything whatsoever to do with anything that might have merited that. I could ony conclude it was some sort of mistake made by the algo.

Well, Dr. Campbell is at least giving us a bit of 1984-sque theater for now. And it seems he's doing it quite well. And that in itself is surely waking some people up.