Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 66

[ecosophia]

As we proceed through the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselesness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries. 

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religious, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.     

Comments

Re: Unexpected Truckers Commission News Flash

[(Anonymous)]

Ron M have you seen the revelations concerning the 'private citizen' who launched the class action lawsuit based on being harassed by honking?

Zexi Lee is not simply the unassuming private citizen she is made out to be.

Re: Unexpected Truckers Commission News Flash

[(Anonymous)]

I am aware of the revelations that Zexi Lee is a federal government employee who has close ties with municipal politicians - and that the lawyer whom she hired for her class action lawsuit approached her (which is illegal).

If there are any other interesting details about this nasty little piece of business (Zexi Lee), please let us know!

Ron M

Re: Unexpected Truckers Commission News Flash

[(Anonymous)]

Oh yes VERY interesting!!!

https://twitter.com/KenWinsor4/status/1590528644027678720

Re: Unexpected Truckers Commission News Flash

[(Anonymous)]

Thanks for the revealing clip. I remember Brendan Miller asking Zexi that question, but because he did not follow up with more questions, I did not dwell on it. As it is, there was enough shocking testimony from Zexi's lips to keep us occupied. And besides, it was our first day watching Convoy lawyer Brendan Miller and were not familiar with his modus operandi. A lot of lawyers go 'fishing', but not Miller. He knows a lot more than he lets on and he very slowly builds cases around witnesses' sworn testimony even when he appears to be 'just fishing'. Usually his last question is the most important and revealing -- but not necessarily revealing at the time that the question is asked. Let's see where all this leads.

Ron M