ecosophia | Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 6

The semi-open posts I've hosted here on the Covid-19 narrative, the inadequately tested experimental drugs for it, and the whole cascading mess surrounding them have continued to field a gargantuan (and increasing) number of comments, so I'm opening another space for discussion. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.

3. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Why do you censor certain information in the comments? You are keeping important information from reaching your viewership.

Please read the introductory post. If it doesn't sink in, read it again.

tl:dr: His forum, his rules.

Other forums have different rules you might like better [cough]Faceplant[cough][cough]

Lol, something makes me think we can easily find that "important information" just about anywhere.

"viewership"

Who does he think you are?

Concern. Troll.

Well, yes. I thought it was highly amusing, however, and since he decided to be polite, I put it through so I could be just as polite about telling him to go home and sit under his bridge.

They're gonna need a bigger bridge>

NikoB

Here you go. They're already all wet...

This is hilarious.

As if JMG is some sort of poooooooowerful controller of the flow of "important information" into the minds of us in the (snicker) viewership, keeping us in the dark. I cannot listen to any radio station, read any news, look at the vast majority of the interwebs, or talk to half of the people I know without being beaten over the head with all sorts of "important information" I have heard a zillion times already.

One of the sad things about trolls is that they're so unimaginative. This same gimmick is one that I field at least half a dozen times a year, on the most varied subjects -- but of course all the people in question want to drown out the diversity of opinion on my blog with yet another rehash of (a) what the corporate media is saying or (b) what's currently all the rage in conspiracy culture.

IKR? Like we can't just pop over to CNN and get that Very Important Information?

"viewership"

Such a short post, and yet they were still too lazy to customize it. Copy. Paste. Copy. Paste. Either it's a bot or it's a very, very boring job.

I sometimes wonder if even bots get bored...

"Viewership"

I'm willing to bet that this very strange choice of words means this was some sort of automated system that noticed that it's comments kept disappearing.

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 6

Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG

Re: Question for JMG