ecosophia: (Default)
John Michael Greer ([personal profile] ecosophia) wrote2025-07-15 10:17 am

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 204

fact checkWe are now approaching the end of the fourth year of these open posts. When I first posted a tentative hypothesis on the course of the Covid phenomenon, I had no idea that discussion on the subject would still be necessary all these years later, much less that it would turn into so lively, complex, and troubling a conversation. Still, here we are. Crude death rates and other measures of collapsing public health are anomalously high in many countries, but nobody in authority wants to talk about the inadequately tested experimental Covid injections that are the most likely cause; public health authorities government shills for the pharmaceutical industry are still trying to push through laws that will allow them to force vaccinations on anyone they want; public trust in science is collapsing; and the story continues to unfold.

So it's time for another open post. The rules have been slightly expanded due to a recent discussion here:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry and its government enablers are causing injury and death on a massive scale. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its wholly owned politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you plan on making off topic comments, please go away. This is an open post for discussion of the Covid epidemic, the vaccines, drugs, policies, and other measures that supposedly treat it, and other topics directly relevant to those things. It is not a place for general discussion of unrelated topics. Nor is it a place to ask for medical advice; giving such advice, unless you're a licensed health care provider, legally counts as practicing medicine without a license and is a crime in the US. Don't even go there.


5. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

6. Please don't just post bare links without explanation. A sentence or two telling readers what's on the other side of the link is a reasonable courtesy, and if you don't include it, your attempted post will be deleted.

7. Please don't post LLM ("AI") generated content. This is a place for human beings to talk to other human beings, not for the regurgitation of machine-generated text. Also, please don't discuss large language models (the technology popularly and inaccurately called "artificial intelligence" these days) except as they bear directly on the Covid phenomenon. Here again, my finger is hovering over the delete button. 

Please also note that nothing posted here should be construed as medical advice, which neither I nor the commentariat (excepting those who are licensed medical providers) are qualified to give. Please take your medical questions to the licensed professional provider of your choice.


With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Re: mRNA Shots Destroy 8.4% of Non-Renewable Eye Cells

[personal profile] angelica5804 2025-07-16 06:24 pm (UTC)(link)
Indeed. That's why alternatives like nattokinase, DMSO, methylene blue and chlorine dioxide have been so important in my own healing from long covid. In my experience all of them have helped me reverse the impairment that I feared was permanent. I recently tried BPC-157 to reverse my difficulty building physical endurance, something that matters a lot to me as I am very active. For the first time since I got Covid four years ago, I feel like my body is getting enough oxygen when I push my endurance. Big kudos to all of the writers out there who are taking risks to educate us about these options.

Re: mRNA Shots Destroy 8.4% of Non-Renewable Eye Cells

[personal profile] stubborn_ass 2025-07-17 10:17 am (UTC)(link)
You mentioned nattokinase, DMSO, methylene blue and chlorine dioxide. Each of them have a main mode of action that would be beneficial in your situation, but there's also minor effects which overlap between them. I've used methylene blue for my wife, when she got her brain infection from shedding, but it's something I would avoid as it does make the tongue blue and obvious to others. I want to be able to remain discreet in public, in the high-shedding environment that we live in. That means that we have to take out suite of protective supplements everyday, and I'm not sure about chlorine dioxide on a long-term basis in case I mess up the dosage. To that end, that's why we use serrapeptase and nicotine patches to replace the last 2 on your list. Just a fwiw. The benefits and mode of action have been discussed before.

As for BPC 157.... that's one of the most useful peptides we can use. The downside is that because it is so useful, it's literally banned as a 'performance enhancing drug' by WADA, and you can't find it easily in most countries. Thus when you make the purchases, it's much harder to verify the quality and veracity of what you're getting... thus something that should be affordable becomes an expensive item. I have it in my general stash of stuff that works - very well - but am aware that the cost issue might be tough for many people. But it's utterly safe for long-term use, as it's just a derivative of one of our gastric peptides. Some people heal naturally much faster than others, and having a bigger natural store of that healing factor is a major factor. The interesting thing is that one cannot choose how the body heals when using it. If an athlete injects it at an injured knee area, his body may use the BPC157 to heal some other areas that it deems more important or critical.. so he may have to use it for an extended period of time before the body gets to the knee. It can also be taken orally, which makes it very useful.

I have a friend, who's son is badly vex injured by his ex-wife taking their 2 kids to be jabbed despite his protests. The son literally fainted after each jab right at the vex center.... and upon his medical checkup before enlistment for his 'national service' (aka conscription), they confirmed that he has some heart issues now. I spent quite a few hours thinking about this... healing the heart is very tough and complicated. It's pretty much the only organ that never sleeps.. and our soul/consciousness is tied to it. Too many folks have suffered heart damage after the shots... an obvious remedy would be to make sure that our blood circulation is not suffering from even microclots (aka via enteric coated natto/serra) and have the proper zeta potential, via certain foods and proper grounding. That would reduce the workload for the heart.

But to heal it? I think the only thing is a combination of TB500 and BPC157. TB500 is yet another useful peptides which the Soviets discovered in the 60's (same for BPC157). Unfortunately the TB500 has to be injected. The costs will be high, but not astronomical, certainly nothing compared to doing heart transplants etc. As for now, it remains a theoretical solution as the medical industrial complex will not come near it. But I felt it was something that you might want to be aware of, since you have become familiar with BPC157.

Re: mRNA Shots Destroy 8.4% of Non-Renewable Eye Cells

[personal profile] angelica5804 2025-07-17 06:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Hi Stubborn_Ass,
Thank you for your very thoughtful and helpful reply. You are the second person I have encountered who recommends the combination of TB500 and BPC157. It appears TB500 is now available in capsules. When you say it has to be injected, is that your preferred delivery method?

I am sorry to hear about your friend's son. I am seeing so much of this sort of thing these days.

Re: mRNA Shots Destroy 8.4% of Non-Renewable Eye Cells

[personal profile] stubborn_ass 2025-07-18 02:07 am (UTC)(link)
TB500 is not very bio-available via the oral route... for BPC157, perhaps up to half may get neutered by the stomach acid, but that's still considered high bioavailability.