scotlyn: balancing posture in sword form (Default)
scotlyn ([personal profile] scotlyn) wrote in [personal profile] ecosophia 2025-04-23 04:38 pm (UTC)

Re: Negative Religious Exemption

"For example, if you could have demonstrated that vaccines belong to the religion of progress, could you be exempted by merely stating you do not believe in this god?"

Indeed, I have mentioned here once or twice that I am waiting for people to take up THIS type of "exemption". A sort of "No, I decline to join your cult" sort of argument.

I don't know if it rates as a negative exemption, but it places the burden of demonstrating that it is NOT "religious" back upon those who are so vexed and perturbed by any manifestation of doubt, hesitancy, non-compliance with regards to their revered pharmaceutical miraculous vial.

Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened)
(will be screened)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting