the_arcane_archivist: (0)
the_arcane_archivist ([personal profile] the_arcane_archivist) wrote in [personal profile] ecosophia 2025-03-02 08:22 am (UTC)

Re: Living in the Aftermath - New diseases

New diseases - I put something like this before. A neighbor of mine has a throat problem after the waxxine, that cannot diagnose for 3 year she spent a lot of money on that, though unwaxxined, I also have a stomach problem after 3 years after a BOVID bout, another neigbourh, unwaxined after BOVID 3 years in still doesn't have the sense of smell, interesting that these were after the waxxine rollout, even if we haven't took the waxxine, so the shedding spectrum rules above this.


I know people are tired of this AI thing but it keeps apearing, I like team Trump especially after the last WH mega show but this team has a strange health view almost shizoid, with RFK Jr. against waxxines while people like musk dreaming of AI in health:

This is from last year:
https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/elon-musk-suggests-grok-ai-has-role-healthcare
and this is from yesterday:
https://www.soapcentral.com/pop-culture/news-it-s-actually-better-doctors-tell-you-elon-musk-talks-a-i-helpful-medical-grok-better-doctors-cases

Both BOVID and the waxxine seem to have produced new diseases, now that we explored here the possibilities of all of these: BOVID, the spike protein, the waxxine, the testing of the waxxine, has been done by or with the assistance of AI be it either, molecular generative, LLM, or specific neural networks.

AI works well in a stable context, but its own success disrupts that context. As an example it is said that the Arab Spring was done by facebook, so we can see what the Facebook AI has done in ME. Models are trained on data from an environment that is now shifting, making them increasingly ineffective. As clean data becomes scarce and expensive, AI systems become costlier and harder to improve. Meanwhile, cheaper distilled models will catch up, eliminating initial advantages and equalises the AI market making them look alike pretty fast. If AI is deployed in critical operations, a technological collapse could lead to chaos, as models will keep applying outdated rules to a completely different reality.

So in the end health or otherwise, this is the worse case scenario, we get to depend on this tech that will last for years if not decades, which when it dies it will leave a completely different world that needs healthy, motivated and smart people, but you might have the exact opposite. Already this happens to a degree.


Post a comment in response:

(will be screened)
(will be screened)
(will be screened)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting