The trend was rising for sure, but since the introduction of the jab we see a sharp increase. Especially very agressive cancers in young people without any history in that direction is baffling the doctors. I don't think hopium is going to do much good here, so don't be baffled too!
Yesterday, Jeff Childers reported about the way the MSM is dealing with the explosion. They suddenly raised the alarm with gruesome stories about young people getting cancer while only showing the slow but steady increase from the 1990's till 2019. He askes:"Why now raise the alarm and where are the more recent data?". Of course the most likely answer is that both are very much related.... As it happens I see exacly the same in the Dutch media in the past 1 or 2 weeks. Much talk and anecdote about young people getting cancer, only old data and doctors being baffled. Yeah right...
PS If you followed this forum, you know that we have discussed several pathways in which the jab can cause (turbo) cancer. From inpairing the DNA-repair mechanisms to oncogenic SV-40 in the Pfizer jab to the shedding of said SV-40, it's all been discussed extensively here.
no subject
Yesterday, Jeff Childers reported about the way the MSM is dealing with the explosion. They suddenly raised the alarm with gruesome stories about young people getting cancer while only showing the slow but steady increase from the 1990's till 2019. He askes:"Why now raise the alarm and where are the more recent data?". Of course the most likely answer is that both are very much related.... As it happens I see exacly the same in the Dutch media in the past 1 or 2 weeks. Much talk and anecdote about young people getting cancer, only old data and doctors being baffled. Yeah right...
PS If you followed this forum, you know that we have discussed several pathways in which the jab can cause (turbo) cancer. From inpairing the DNA-repair mechanisms to oncogenic SV-40 in the Pfizer jab to the shedding of said SV-40, it's all been discussed extensively here.