I think I can propose a hypothesis that can explain what you're seeing: immune system damage from vaccines causing a broad general decline in population immunity, aka herd immunity. Wikipedia has a decent article on the basic concept:
Like most accounts of population immunity, this one focuses on the effect of vaccinations and/or naturally acquired immunity on specific organisms. Think about the implications more generally, though. Under most circumstances, one of the core challenges faced by transmissible pathogens is simply a matter of getting to vulnerable people -- at each step in the chain of transmission, they have to deal with somebody else's immune system, and if most people in society have immune systems in decent condition, that's a difficult wall for them to climb.
Now consider what happens when more than half of the population has taken a pharmaceutical that disables their immune systems. All of a sudden that wall falls flat. When a pathogen leaps to some new person, odds are it's someone whose immune system won't react, so the pathogen has no trouble at all establishing itself in a new host, reproducing freely, and leaping from there. Even if the person's symptoms remain subclinical -- and with their immune system partly disabled, this is likely -- they'll be shedding bouncing baby pathogens wherever they go. So those of us with healthy immune systems have to deal with a drastic increase in pathogen load in our environments, and thus we get sick more often.
Meanwhile those whose immune systems have been damaged are also getting sick -- though they may be much sicker than they appear, since so much of what we consider "illness" is in fact immune response. If there is in fact a general decrease in immune function due to the vaccines, and this is permitting a wide range of opportunistic organisms to flourish to one degree or another in the vaccinated, a great many people could be seriously -- even fatally -- ill without showing symptoms other than tiredness, confusion, and malaise.
All this brings to mind a hideous comparison. One of the things that makes Yersinia pestis, the organism that causes bubonic plague, so deadly is that it can suppress the human inflammation response. Different strains of Y. pestis vary in their ability to do this. I read an article years back -- unfortunately I have been unable to find it again just now -- arguing that the strain that caused the Black Death of 1345-1349 was very, very good at this, so people didn't feel ill until very late in the course of the disease; this permitted them to spread the plague freely and then suddenly drop dead.
It might be worth considering some similar mechanism as a potential cause of the sudden deaths among vaccinated people that are continuing at present, long after the spike proteins should have run their course...
Population Immunity
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herd_immunity
Like most accounts of population immunity, this one focuses on the effect of vaccinations and/or naturally acquired immunity on specific organisms. Think about the implications more generally, though. Under most circumstances, one of the core challenges faced by transmissible pathogens is simply a matter of getting to vulnerable people -- at each step in the chain of transmission, they have to deal with somebody else's immune system, and if most people in society have immune systems in decent condition, that's a difficult wall for them to climb.
Now consider what happens when more than half of the population has taken a pharmaceutical that disables their immune systems. All of a sudden that wall falls flat. When a pathogen leaps to some new person, odds are it's someone whose immune system won't react, so the pathogen has no trouble at all establishing itself in a new host, reproducing freely, and leaping from there. Even if the person's symptoms remain subclinical -- and with their immune system partly disabled, this is likely -- they'll be shedding bouncing baby pathogens wherever they go. So those of us with healthy immune systems have to deal with a drastic increase in pathogen load in our environments, and thus we get sick more often.
Meanwhile those whose immune systems have been damaged are also getting sick -- though they may be much sicker than they appear, since so much of what we consider "illness" is in fact immune response. If there is in fact a general decrease in immune function due to the vaccines, and this is permitting a wide range of opportunistic organisms to flourish to one degree or another in the vaccinated, a great many people could be seriously -- even fatally -- ill without showing symptoms other than tiredness, confusion, and malaise.
All this brings to mind a hideous comparison. One of the things that makes Yersinia pestis, the organism that causes bubonic plague, so deadly is that it can suppress the human inflammation response. Different strains of Y. pestis vary in their ability to do this. I read an article years back -- unfortunately I have been unable to find it again just now -- arguing that the strain that caused the Black Death of 1345-1349 was very, very good at this, so people didn't feel ill until very late in the course of the disease; this permitted them to spread the plague freely and then suddenly drop dead.
It might be worth considering some similar mechanism as a potential cause of the sudden deaths among vaccinated people that are continuing at present, long after the spike proteins should have run their course...