My original hypothesis turned out to be at least partly inaccurate, in that (a) the problem with the vaccines wasn't as simple as antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) and (b) we were nowhere near the endgame. There are factors at work that, three years ago, I didn't anticipate.
First, the vaccines seem to set off at least two different classes of side effects on a large scale. First, in the relatively near term, they cause problems with blood clots, which can set off a cascade of different system failures. Second, over the longer term, they appear to cause some kind of diffuse immune system failure, leading to increased mortality from cancers and a range of other illnesses. There may be even more classes of side effects; one of the reasons why it's a good idea to test vaccines for ten years before making them available to the public is that it can take a long time for all the problems to become evident. We have another five and a half years or so to go.
Second, the negative effects, though widespread, are inconsistent. I've begun to wonder if the original vaccines were so bad in terms of their side effects that they were abruptly replaced by something else -- the way that the vaccines early on had to be kept at extreme cold temperatures, and then suddenly that requirement vanished without a trace, suggests to me that this might well have happened. Perhaps the vaccines were replaced with placebos in order to dilute the effects on a population scale; perhaps some new pharmaceutical was slipped in in place of the original, extremely toxic ones.
So the endgame is much more complex than I had anticipated three years ago. The damage to the reputation of science and medicine seems to be even worse than I'd guessed, and the longer this gets dragged out, the worse it seems likely to become.
I'm very glad to say that at this point, however, my later hypothesis about demonic involvement seems to have disproved itself. Reckless endangermentpof whole populations and depraved indifference to human life motivated by the ordinary human motives of greed, arrogance, and incompetence are bad enough!
no subject
First, the vaccines seem to set off at least two different classes of side effects on a large scale. First, in the relatively near term, they cause problems with blood clots, which can set off a cascade of different system failures. Second, over the longer term, they appear to cause some kind of diffuse immune system failure, leading to increased mortality from cancers and a range of other illnesses. There may be even more classes of side effects; one of the reasons why it's a good idea to test vaccines for ten years before making them available to the public is that it can take a long time for all the problems to become evident. We have another five and a half years or so to go.
Second, the negative effects, though widespread, are inconsistent. I've begun to wonder if the original vaccines were so bad in terms of their side effects that they were abruptly replaced by something else -- the way that the vaccines early on had to be kept at extreme cold temperatures, and then suddenly that requirement vanished without a trace, suggests to me that this might well have happened. Perhaps the vaccines were replaced with placebos in order to dilute the effects on a population scale; perhaps some new pharmaceutical was slipped in in place of the original, extremely toxic ones.
So the endgame is much more complex than I had anticipated three years ago. The damage to the reputation of science and medicine seems to be even worse than I'd guessed, and the longer this gets dragged out, the worse it seems likely to become.
I'm very glad to say that at this point, however, my later hypothesis about demonic involvement seems to have disproved itself. Reckless endangermentpof whole populations and depraved indifference to human life motivated by the ordinary human motives of greed, arrogance, and incompetence are bad enough!