ecosophia | Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 113

We are now in the third year of these open posts. As the phrase "died suddenly" repeats in the mass media like a mantra, statistics for work days lost to illness and all-cause mortality mount up in heavily vaccinated nations, and more and more ugly facts about the official response to Covid spill out into public, we are entering what may well turn out to be the most difficult period of the Covid disaster -- the phase in which denial rises in lockstep with the death rate, and a great many people try not to admit what has been done to them by the people and institutions they trusted. It could get ugly, folks.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.

3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue.

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

What is this natin-wide? north american-wide? test over wi-fi running tomorrow afternoon? How does this impact the V-jected? I've gotten an email from the Energetic Health Institute forwarded to me about turning off devices.

I can't argue turning off the devices. EMFs are toxic in their own right.

The claim is that the jabs also contained Marburg virus, e-coli, and maybe a bit of Barry Manilow in the lipid nano particles that would release their payload when exposed to a pulsating frequency of 18 Ghz. FEMA is doing a test of the emergency broadcast system across all wireless providers tomorrow.

I could be wrong, I'm not a biochemist, but this doesn't seem too likely to me. Given all the conspiracy theory later proven fact, I can't dismiss it as something from watching Halloween III, Season of the Witch at an acid party, but I'm not sold either.

If we see an outbreak of hemoragic fever in the week following tomorrows test, then I guess it is now conspiracy fact.

This might just be in the same category as the jabs containing nano tracking devices. No. Those are your cell phones, dear.

Come to think of it, anyone who has a cell phone ought to just turn it off and throw it in the freezer either way. It would be healthier physically and socially. Like I told my boss, the name of my company issued cell phone is 'Down Range.'

“Halloween III Season Of The Witch”

LOL!!!!!

Thanks for that old memory.

A quick Presearch tells me it’s about the FCC and FEMA getting together and running a test of the Emergency Alert System. You know when your radio or TV puts out a hideous screeching sound, preceded and followed by a portentous announcement about how this is keeping you safe? It’s like that, only it’ll be on your cell phone.

Remember when the Emergency Alert System saved many lives in New Orleans during the hurricane Katrina disaster? Me neither. I’m guessing this will be about as useful as that.

to be fair, the alert system is mostly useless, but there are a couple of things it is actually good for-- tornado alerts and tsunami warnings come to mind. Not everybody lives in range of the sirens, or keeps their TV on all the time... but nearly everyone has a cell phone.

In the US, they are required by law to test the system every 3 years. It's just like every other alert that's ever been sent out on your phone, except if you happen to be in the grocery store, everybody's phone will go off at once... just like when there's a tornado alert in your area (maybe you don't live in a tornado area).

There isn't any new tech being employed.

Does anyone know how much these tests increase traffic accidents? It seems to me like "loud emergency alert" going off would distract a lot of drivers....

I'm glad that I know about this planned test, because I'm about to head off to my job at the grocery store today! :-0

https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10150578

I wouldn't take it too seriously. Anyone can broadcast those according to this paper. As a general rule smartphones are insecure with little recourse to make them so. Keep it off until you need it.

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 113

no subject

no subject

no subject

Just a guess

Re: Just a guess

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject