Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 99

[ecosophia]

As we proceed through the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselessness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries. 

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religions, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Comments

[dendroica]

I had thought of that possibility - that the "hot lots" were also the early lots and had fewer recipients just because the initial lot sizes were smaller. I'm quite surprised that the authors didn't include an analysis by date, as the date of reports should have been readily available. I guess I assumed that they probably did at least a cursory date-based analysis and found no reason to look further, but that's only because that's what *I* would do. Thanks for taking the time to dig into the VAERS data yourself and to share your findings with us.

I'm somewhat skeptical that they reduced the dose over time, given that the dosage was one of the parameters that was always clearly stated. I would not be at all surprised though to learn that the earlier lots caused more problems due to e.g. differences in overall formulation, in manufacturing practices and consistency, in handling practices, etc.

Ignoring all of the willful fraud and the dubiousness of the whole mRNA concept, the vaccine factories were producing a new product using techniques that had never previously been scaled, and were under immense pressure from corporate headquarters and global governments and international media to meet their promised delivery timelines and to scale up production as fast as possible. That's the sort of situation that always leads to cut corners and shoddy output, whatever it is that is being produced.