If you look at the jab rollout as a testing exercise to determine lethality and effect for various blends and dose levels, the data and behavior make more sense. Remember, it never was a 'vaccine' and never had any therapeutic value, so normal safety controls had no relevance.
Then again, the requirement to transport at minus 60 degrees - assuming that was true, because once batches were broken out for distribution there's no way to keep them at minus 60, so how was the time period controlled from when a dose was unfrozen to when it was injected? - is unlikely to have been met in many situations.
Result? Recipients likely got some sort of toxic mush with varying amounts of mRNA and other bioweapon ingredients still active.
no subject
Then again, the requirement to transport at minus 60 degrees - assuming that was true, because once batches were broken out for distribution there's no way to keep them at minus 60, so how was the time period controlled from when a dose was unfrozen to when it was injected? - is unlikely to have been met in many situations.
Result? Recipients likely got some sort of toxic mush with varying amounts of mRNA and other bioweapon ingredients still active.