The most common source of inaccurate interpretations of geomantic readings is overthinking them. You asked a fifth house question; your significator in the first passes to the fifth, and it's a very favorable figure -- Laetitia. This chart perfects by occupation, the strongest mode of perfection. The answer to your question is "yes" -- and you can stop right there.
Now of course this chart *also* perfects by translation, with Tristitia in the 6th and 12th, and it has Laetitia in the 9th trine both significators. Those simply reinforce the basic meaning, which is "yes." The crucial point, though, is that the answer to your question is determined by the presence or absence of at least one mode of perfection between querent and quesited. The rest is much less important, and when there's a definite answer given by the mode of perfection, the rest doesn't really matter.
no subject
Now of course this chart *also* perfects by translation, with Tristitia in the 6th and 12th, and it has Laetitia in the 9th trine both significators. Those simply reinforce the basic meaning, which is "yes." The crucial point, though, is that the answer to your question is determined by the presence or absence of at least one mode of perfection between querent and quesited. The rest is much less important, and when there's a definite answer given by the mode of perfection, the rest doesn't really matter.