![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 74
As we proceed through the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselessness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries. So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:
1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.
2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue.
4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religious, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.
With that said, the floor is open for discussion.
Did National Security Imperatives Compromise COVID-19 Vaccine Safety? by Philip Altman
(Anonymous) 2023-01-09 04:00 pm (UTC)(link)Did National Security Imperatives Compromise COVID-19 Vaccine Safety?
BY Phillip Altman
January 5, 2023
https://brownstone.org/articles/did-national-security-imperatives-compromise-covid-19-vaccine-safety/
Re: Did National Security Imperatives Compromise COVID-19 Vaccine Safety? by Philip Altman
Peter McCullough, Nov 8, 2022
https://www.americaoutloud.com/department-of-defense-driving-mass-vaccination-while-fda-and-vaccine-companies-are-powerless-to-stop-it/
TRANSCRIPT -- BRIEF EXCERPT
10:57
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH*: I've got a special guest and I've been waiting to get her on the program for so long and I tell you what she has red-hot information. Probably the most important issue that's in front of everybody who's taken one of the vaccines, and what we're going to get into is an answer to I think one of the most fundamental questions, the hardest question that Joe Rogan** asked me is that why do some people have problems with the vaccines and others don't?
Our guest is Dr. Alexandria [Alexandra] Latypova*** who received her undergraduate education in the Ukraine and then received a masters of business administration at Dartmouth, so she didn't receive a doctoral degree but she's worked in the pharmaceutical industry as an executive and now is a freelance analyst and she's done I think the most important analysis and that is on the lot variability. Sasha, welcome to the McCullough Report.
ALEXANDRA [SASHA] LATYPOVA: Thank you, Dr. McCullough. Thank you for inviting me. I'm really glad to speak to your audience and discuss the result of my over-a-year-long analysis.
DR. PETER MCCULLOUGH: OK. So to set the stage, recently the Zogby Survey Company comes out and they do what looks like a representative survey**** and of people out there, two thirds of people took the vaccine, a third who didn't, but of the two thirds that take the vaccine 15% have some new medical problem and they regret taking the vaccine. But that means 85% are fine.
Second piece of information. The CDC under court order has to release the V-safe data, the self-reported data that people have on their cell phones which they electively do, you take a vaccine, they ask you to do V-safe [an app] and they did it. CDC didn't want to release that to the public. Aaron Siri the attorney forces them to release it to the NGO ICAN.* ICAN puts it up on their server and they analyze it, and they find that between 7 and 8% of people who take the vaccine, something bad happens and they have to go an ER, an urgent care, be hospitalized. OK so that piece of information is out there.
And then we have the peer-reviewed literature, a thousand peer-reviewed literature papers now on fatal and nonfatal vaccine injuries.**
And then we have the safety data bases, the VAERS vaccine adverse event reporting system,*** the UK Yellow Cage system, the [inaudible] system, the WHO VigiBase system, and there's actually 39 total safety systems. It's all summarized in the World Council for Health Report on Pharmacovigilance for the vaccines.**** And they're all pointing to the same observation, that there's a proportion of patients who take the vaccines and it appears as if nothing happens. And that proportion is the majority and thank goodness. But there is a real minority where they take the vaccines and something happens, including serious injuries and deaths.
So with that backdrop let's start out with what you've analyzed with respect to the companies and who makes these vaccines. And walk us through how a covid 19 vaccine is made. And I think for simplicity's sake why don't we just stick with the messenger RNA vaccines.
ALEXANDRA [SASHA] LATYPOVA: Yeah so that's exactly right. So the first thing I did when I became alarmed by the actions of regulatory authorities, especially with respect to suppression of hydoxychloroquine and other early treatments, as a professional I was extremely alarmed by this and I started looking into this issue much more closely. You know I'm a private citizen, I only have access to VAERS, as everyone else does, and so that's where I went to look. And I wanted to specifically look at the VAERS reports by manufacturing lot numbers. That information exists in VAERS and no other, none of these other data bases that you mention contain this information, so my analysis was to look at adverse events and deaths reported for these mRNA shots per lot number.
As you probably understand as common sense for everyone to know that a lot of something mass-produced, including drugs, food or beverage should always look about the same. If you buy aspirin today in a pharmacy, next month when you buy the same bottle of aspirin it should have the same performance about safety and efficacy as you expect from this product, as you know, as physicians know, as consumers know. So what we are supposed to see when we look at adverse events and deaths by lot number is a straight line across and as close to zero as possible as far as the adverse events and deaths. And that's called safe, effective, and well-manufactured product, product manufactured according to Good Manufacturing Practices, which is a set of laws in the United States covered by a code of federal regulation [inaudible] actually very, very extensive.
And so to do that I looked at the flu vaccines which are very widely administered in the United States, about 50% of the population gets them every year, it's a wide variety of people, children and older adults, so that's a good comparator. And when I looked at the flu vaccines they looked as expected. They looked as a, you know, all the lots looked as a line across the bottom of the graph close to zero. The maximum we ever found, and this is spanning 20, 30 years of data in VAERS, was 37 reports, serious adverse event reports for a lot, and there were probably a couple of deaths. And deaths were very few and far in between, not every lot had them, really just very rare occurrence you could say. And again, flu vaccines are administered in millions and millions of doses, half the population of the US every year. So that was as expected.
And then when I looked at these mRNA shots, at the time also contained Jansen, it's barely used today, the picture looked extremely, extremely alarming.
The range of the adverse events was you know, some lots had maybe 3 to 5 and some lots had 5,000 to 6,000. So the variation by thousands of times was absolutely abnormal, completely not expected from a good manufacturing practice produced product. And so that answer was right away that these products are not produced to good manufacturing practices. Something very wrong is going with this manufacturing.
I then started you know this research, you know continued this research for a year. I wrote letters, Senator Ron Johnson used my data in one his letters to FDA, CDC, manufacturers, which still remains unanswered, you know, asking questions, why this data looks this way.
We also found very abnormal patterns for, based on geography. There were clustering of lots with really bad performance, really bad set of adverse events and deaths. Some lots have several hundreds deaths in one lot, which is just incredible.
The data looks also really bad when you look geographically by each state in the United States. For example states like South Dakota and Kentucky look like death zone, they each have over 30 deaths per 100,000 vaccinated people, that's just VAERS, and you know it's very underreported.
And also there are lots that have dozens of deaths in them in those states. And again I do not believe that this is not known to health authorities in those states. And any lot of anything that produces you know even a couple of deaths, five deaths, is immediately suspect for removal from the market, recalled. And those recalls never happened.
In fact I found that on January 18th 2021, just couple of weeks after full roll out of these mRNA and DNA vaccines in the United States, the health authority of Orange County California accidentally did their job and they found a lot of Moderna that had abnormal number of, they called it allergic reactions, and they said that we're pausing injections from this lot. And this was identified in numerous news reports including even on CNN. They— after a very brief investigation seems like, nothing was done. The lot continued to be distributed all over United States until end of March when it ran out, and it resulted ultimately in about 3,500 serious adverse events and 60 deaths across the United States.
So this is after it was flagged by a county health department. After it was flagged by a county health department it continued to be distributed all over United States and resulted in at least 60 deaths.
So that is an extremely alarming finding. And also of course points to intentional acts.
But you know the question is, how is these vaccines made, how they manufactured, who makes them? That was a much longer investigation and ultimately, and I'll give you a short summary of this, these products are made by a consortium of companies. A majority of this consortium is kind of a hidden to the public, kind of like an iceberg. What you see is Pfizer and Moderna and Jansen being advertised everywhere as manufacturers of these products, but in reality is it's a consortium of traditional and nontraditional suppliers to the Department of Defense. And this consortium has been put in place over a long period of time. I have contracts going back at least to 2012. These are millions, they've established millions of square feet of manufacturing capacity, equipment, supplies, assays, kits, staff, you know, infrastructure, security systems, logistics and so forth, to enable manufacturing of these kinds of products. And those are the companies that are making them. Pfizer and Moderna and Jansen are involved somewhat in some pieces of it, but the entire product is made in this sort of opaque black box DOD completely controlled by the Department of Defense set of contracts and regulations and rules that these guys have to comply with. And so they are producing something that cannot be traced.
And today there is no clarity at all about the manufacturing process. Obviously it's broken. Obviously it's producing bad product, a very inconsistent product. And you know these questions remain unanswered. So the raw material suppliers and intermediate vendors are not good manufacturing practice compliant, nor are Pfizer or Moderna really because the entire chain needs to be compliant for it to be a compliant product.
23:08
[END OF EXCERPT]
# # #
TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:
*Dr. Peter McCullough links:
website: https://www.petermcculloughmd.com/
Substack (co-authored with John Leake): https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/archive
Podcast: The McCullough Report https://www.americaoutloud.com/author/dr-peter-mccullough/
**Joe Rogan interviewed Dr. Peter McCullough podcast #1747
[note: I have had trouble finding the original link, will update ASAP
https://rumble.com/vqv99d-joe-rogan-video-dr.-peter-mccullough-full-interveiw-a-very-experienced-doct.html ]
***Alexandra Latypova's Substack: https://substack.com/profile/50868935-sasha-latypova
****Zogby Survey: see https://childrenshealthdefense.org/press-release/15-of-american-adults-diagnosed-with-new-condition-after-covid-vaccine-zogby-survey-finds/
Direct downloads to Zogby survey results:
https://johnzogbystrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/XTABS_ALL-ADULTS-and-COVID-Vaccines-Survey_July-2022.pdf
https://johnzogbystrategies.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/XTABS_18-49-and-COVID-Vaccines-Survey_July-2022.pdf
*Aaron Siri's substack: https://aaronsiri.substack.com
ICAN is the Informed Consent Action Network, webpage is https://icandecide.org
The V-safe data can be found at https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/
**Peer-reviewed literature on vaccine injuries, see for example:
https://react19.org/1250-covid-vaccine-reports/
***VAERS is the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System, official US government data base.
https://vaers.hhs.gov/about.html
(Note: https://openvaers.com/covid-data provides VAERS data in a more reader-friendly presentation)
****World Council for Health Report on Pharmacovigilance for the vaccines
See https://worldcouncilforhealth.org/news/independent-pharmacovigilance-report-recall-of-covid-19-vaccines/
Re: Did National Security Imperatives Compromise COVID-19 Vaccine Safety? by Philip Altman
(Anonymous) 2023-01-09 10:22 pm (UTC)(link)