ecosophia | Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 74

As we proceed through the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselessness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.

3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue.

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religious, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

Somehow if you mention the fact that a young fit NFL player had a heart attack, and even ask the question about his vaccination status, it gets you labeled as human garbage.

I don't think anyone who asks or asked that question wishes the player ill will. Oh well, I guess as human garbage (and I didn't know I was until someone else who'd dared to think a thought was labeled as such) I need to be ready for getting fire hosed as a lunatic fringe conspiracy theorist anytime I dare open my mouth, or keyboard.

A guy from Cincinnati.
I'll throw in a half-hearted "who dey" for all you football fans!

Here is an example:

https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/us-sport/damar-hamlin-buffalo-bills-charlie-kirk-conspiracy-b2254990.html

" if you mention the fact that a young fit NFL player had a heart attack, and even ask the question about his vaccination status, it gets you labeled as human garbage"

You can call me Oscar the Grouch, then. Just cold livin' in my trash can, drinkin' my trash cider, spreading the bad news to anyone who walks by.

The top section of this web-page discusses the injury related to vax and comotio cordis.
https://www.coffeeandcovid.com/p/commotio-nonsense-wednesday-january

So, on the one hand you have this ultra-rare type of injury that’s never happened before in 100 years of NFL play, which doesn’t fit well with the facts, and requires special pleading to explain inconvenient facts like how Hamlin stood up after the hit, was hard to revive, why he re-coded at the hospital, why he was unable to breathe on his own, or how his chest pads didn’t sufficiently diffuse any trauma ruling out the type of focused strike needed to stop his heart.

On the other hand, you have the MOST COMMON jab injury in the MOST COMMON age cohort in a fully and recently-jabbed individual. At this point, any doctor who prefers commotio cordis to an adrenaline-triggered jab injury is a doctor that can’t do math and has no business diagnosing anybody.

What will be weird is if it happens during the Super Bowl (I do not wish this on anybody).
I wonder if a lot of people will be watching that game with baited breath?

I think so!

I read somewhere recently the idea that sentimentality is camouflaged or hidden anger. Perhaps anger that cannot be accessed.
Just to play with that idea:
If we discover a cause that is unacceptable for the young man's injury than we risk accessing anger.
That would be a big no-no in threatening the narrative.
Best to stick with 'it brought us all together' or some such fuzzy, warm platitude.

Define "sentimentality" here?

Not arguing, just confused, and trying to understand the thing you are saying. Sentimentality is hidden anger... deflection? Always or just sometimes?

I follow an art theorist's blog and noticed this idea, or something like these words put together this way, but didn't really read it at the time. it was late and I was shutting down the computer.

I'm guessing at what it means and I don't want to appear heartless but things like feeling warm inside by donating to the injured football player's 'toy drive' (which of course is a good thing) or putting stuffed animals with flowers next to a fence. Sort of a 'feel good' positivity in opposition to 'negativity' i.e. critical inquiry.

Because the critical inquiry might lead someplace you don't want it to go. You might find anger. Better to be an ostrich and deny the vaxx is involved at all because what that might mean *I Am Enraged At What They Did To Him, To Me.* Keep the anger buried under warm, fuzzy, feelings... 'We Are the World, etc..We are the ones who make a brighter day, you and me...etc....' On Twitter accounts belonging to famous athletes who called for prayer I saw comments saying 'This brought us (America) together.' That seems a sentimental warm fuzzy feeling. And actually rather a surface, transient emotion.

I'm not sure how it would relate to other scenarios. I got the 'warm, fuzzy feeling' phrase from a weekend retreat sponsored by a Christian group for marriage renewal. The facilitator kept talking about 'warm, fuzzy feelings.' I didn't want warm, fuzzy feelings, I was young and I wanted consuming passion and fire which I knew, sadly, I'd never have in that relationship.

So it's like... candlelight vigils are a way of avoiding rioting, or something like that?

I'm not convinced it's entirely a bad thing, if that is the case.

That's a beautiful image .... sacramental....and rather stands me on my head....
I don't know if it's similar or not and will have to give it some thought.... but honestly,
what a beauty of an image.

Dancing nurses in the empty hospital hallway choreographed to syrupy songs like 'We're all in this together...' seem to qualify as 'warm and fuzzy.'

Define "sentimentality" here?

Not arguing, just confused, and trying to understand the thing you are saying. Sentimentality is hidden anger... are we talking deflection? Always or just sometimes?

Well we have known for a long time now that this is on the level of religious sacrament. Faith on this level cannot be challenged by anything, even gentle questioning an observed reality, too much identity caught up in it. No point trying anymore with these sorts. They are lost.

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 74

Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage

Re: Human Garbage