Yeah, generally speaking, I think the mainstream view was that antibiotics don't necessarily hurt viruses, but that they do work for infections in the lungs that can follow on the heels of viruses that can cause pneumonia.

I agree with you - it's like the authorities/pharma/medico/complex forbade certain treatments to try to maximize the damage - Ivermectin etc. I'm sure there are plenty of others too. Ramp up the body count to ramp up the fear factor for their lab-spawn.

First they create the fear, then they proffer this new 'solution' to the problem that they created. And/or banning the use of older treatments to encourage the use of new 'treatments' for which the patents haven't yet expired or whatever.

There's more money in this new MRNA technological platform for delivering 'therapies' of all descriptions. Sure, it's a crap and dangerous platform, but it's highly profitable. Next stop, MRNA therapy for cancer etc. But how to ensure people use the new and profitable products if they're crap and there are tried and tested drugs that work better? Well, I guess they'll have to pave the way by banning the use of the other proven drugs for which the patents have expired and are therefore less profitable to manufacture.

The Ninth Mouse