ecosophia | Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 67

As we proceed through the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselesness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries.

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.

3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue.

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religious, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

A question: a month or two or three ago, one of the substacks put out a post on how the various shots were distributed in time and space. When the data was aggregated, it showed a disturbing but very visible pattern. It appeared that different ‘versions’ of the shots were given in distinct timeframes, and when matched later with the vax damage data, the sense was that the companies were discretely trying things out to see what the effects were on people.

Does anyone remember this post, and who wrote it? Was it el gato? Sage? Jessica?

Murmuration

I believe that was from Alexandra Latypova, the retired pharmaceutical executive who knows a lot about phamaceutical manuufacturing, and has been researching the publically available data and the contracts. I'll see if I can scare up a link for you, if someone doesn't supply one sooner.

Mauve Rubenesque Cockatiel

http://howbadismybatch.info

Last week someone posted the video by Alexandra (Sasha) Latypova, a former pharmaceutical industry executive with 25 years of experience in pharmaceutical research and development.

https://rumble.com/v1m8i9o-alexandra-sasha-latypova-pharmaceutical-products-have-been-removed-for-thes.html

It's well worth a watch and answers your questions.

I actually saw a video about this about a year ago, and I saved the link. It was made by someone else, although others may have written about it. Here it is:

https://web.archive.org/web/20211201151902/https://brandnewtube.com/watch/patterns-in-the-deployment-of-toxic-covid-vaccine-batches_x3LiCNOENb23dnk.html

The data is a bit old now, so I don't know if the more recent articles have newer info.

d

Alexandra Latypova's 2 presentations from late 2021 and early 2022

https://www.bitchute.com/video/4HlIyBmOEJeY/
Dec 15, 2021

https://www.bitchute.com/video/WMUvLcmP1Wtk/
Jan 3, 2022

She has given several more recent interviews with new information. I would especially recommend her interview by RFK Jr posted August 11, 2022 at this link:
https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/chd-tv/shows/the-defender-show/moderna-clinical-trials-terribly-flawed--fda-knew-it--sasha-latypova-tells-rfk-jr/

Also good is the interview by Dr. Peter McCullough for his podcast on American Outloud:
https://www.americaoutloud.com/why-covid-19-mass-vaccination-is-a-military-operation/

(Not conspiracy theory, this research is documented and based on public documents.)

And the interview by Tessa Lena:
https://tessa.substack.com/p/regulatory-manufacturing-fraud-sasha-latypova

Alexandra Latypova's webpage at Trial Site News is:
https://www.trialsitenews.com/p/latypova

Gee, if they were running experiments, kinda makes me want to be in the control group.

Problem is, not everyone got the memo, they ARE running experiments.

Yep, it is experimental, if you were injected in the US you participated in the trial-- as per the US government's statements on US government websites:

https://www.niaid.nih.gov/grants-contracts/what-operation-warp-speed

https://www.fda.gov/emergency-preparedness-and-response/mcm-legal-regulatory-and-policy-framework/emergency-use-authorization
If you read it carefully you will find that by taking a covid "vaccine" you are in fact participating in a phase 3 trial, that is, an experiment.

The US government webpage about the clinical trials (in other words, experiments), which are anticipated to conclude in March of 2023:
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04848584

It's worse than that. You participated in a trial where no follow-up data were collected, but the people running the trial concluded it was safe anyway.

Can’t recall specific post but there was a lot of citizen reporting on that. While it is no doubt a valid concern given the callousness of the players involved, important to keep in mind also that, on its face, the lipid nano-particle technology required very specific temperature storage conditions to “work” (ie not congeal and/or emulsify).

My sense is that the mean payload point in the normal distribution was significantly less than the maximum possible delivery and that many people just got a dose of synthetic fat mixed with scraps of non viable mRNA. Not exactly reassuring giving fat globules would still cause clotting related effects but would explain why a fair amount of people seem to be doing just fine.

Yes, Dr Cole made exactly that point in a recent conference:

Ryan Cole on the mRNA spikeshot manufacturing process
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lyyN3gB23vAi/

Latypova also. And Yeadon-- That if you got injected, who knows what you actually got injected with, it may not have been the same thing at all that someone else got.

I don't have a link but back in the summer I saw an interview with a woman doctor from Germany. She was part of an Austro-German study group that was examining the blood of both vaxxed and non-vaxxed participants.

She made the statement that no one got a placebo or a simple saline solution according to their rather extensive study (as at that point). She stated that in every case, the vaxxed people had particular (and different) crystalline formations in their blood. She said they did not know what these were or if they were going to cause a problem (although it seems likely they will) since nobody had ever seen such formations before. She also noted that the blood of the unvaxxed did not have these formations and, in fact, the researchers could tell the two groups apart simply from their blood.

About two weeks ago, I read that a study in Australia had duplicated the findings of the European researchers. Again, I don't have a link.

Did anyone else read about this? It would seem to be worth noting for the future.

Liam in Toronto

Can you search your browser history to see if you can pull them up? They sound so interesting to read.

Sorry, I looked but I delete my browser history on a regular basis so no luck.

Liam in Toronto

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 67

Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests

Re: Vax damage tests