ecosophia: (Default)
John Michael Greer ([personal profile] ecosophia) wrote2022-11-15 01:05 pm

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 67

elephant in the roomAs we proceed through the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselesness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries. 

So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before: 

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here. 
 
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue. 

4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. Also, please don't drag in current quarrels about sex, race, religious, etc. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules. 

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.  

Re: Long term sickness

[personal profile] fredsmith11 2022-11-15 11:09 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for the graph of sickness rates, I'd been looking for that data. It matches the reports of employers I talk to.

"the unwillingness of authorities and MSM to address this issue" No surprise, they're the ones who caused it. The MSM is totally captured and a key part of the propaganda machine.

Mercola published an article about long COVID recently. Excerpts:

In an effort to identify long COVID biomarkers, the researchers measured levels of three SARS-CoV-2 antigens: spike protein, the S1 subunit of the spike protein and the nucleocapsid (outer protein coat) of the virus.

All three antigens were found in the blood of 65% of the long COVID patients tested, but the spike protein was the most common, and remained elevated the longest. So, in short, a hallmark of long COVID is the long-term presence of spike protein, and spike protein is precisely what the COVID jabs are instructing your cells to create.

COVID Jab Deaths Are Being Buried
All in all, evidence shows the COVID jabs are an absolute health disaster, yet our health agencies are doing nothing to prevent it. On the contrary, they’ve doubled and tripled down on their COVID shot recommendations while simultaneously burying incriminating evidence.

. . . there appears to be extreme reluctance to addressing post-jab long COVID symptoms publicly. Why?
Dr. Avindra Nath, clinical director at the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and the one leading the NIH’s investigation into long COVID, gives us a clue.

“Probing possible side effects presents a dilemma to researchers: They risk fomenting rejection of vaccines that are generally safe, effective, and crucial to saving lives,” Science writes. “‘You have to be very careful’ before tying COVID vaccines to complications, Nath cautions. ‘You can make the wrong conclusion … The implications are huge.’”

In other words, it’s all about protecting the vaccine industry, which has now merged with and become the experimental gene therapy industry.

Re: Long term sickness

[personal profile] boccaccio 2022-11-16 05:36 pm (UTC)(link)
Do you have a link to the Mercola article or the study about long Covid he cites? It sounds important but I have no luck trying a search engine (surprise, surprise...). I know of the reports of prof. Arne Burkhardt and the study of the Swiss pathologist that relate the sudden death syndrome with spike distribution in critical organs but other than that I haven't much compelling evidence. It only makes sense, though, that long Covid has something to do with spike.

Re: Long term sickness

[personal profile] fredsmith11 2022-11-16 08:52 pm (UTC)(link)
Mercola's site was just cyber attacked, but the article will be behind a paywall now anyway(they only stay public for 48 hours).

I keep a library of his articles, so I can paste it in here if JMG agrees (copyright?).

Mike Adams at www.naturalnews.com has interviews about the same subject. You can also find them on www.brighteon.com. Rumble usually has a good selection too.

Re: Long term sickness

[personal profile] boccaccio 2022-11-17 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh bummer. Perhaps you have the link to the scientific publication? In that case there will be no trouble with copyrights and I can read the source directly. I didn't get far with Mike Adams site where it comes to finding the data/study.