![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
Entry tags:
Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 56
As we move further into the second year of these open posts, it's pretty clear that the official narrative is cracking as the toll of deaths and injuries from the Covid vaccines rises steadily and the vaccines themselves demonstrate their total uselesness at preventing Covid infection or transmission. It's still important to keep watch over the mis-, mal- and nonfeasance of our self-proclaimed health gruppenfuehrers, and the disastrous results of the Covid mania, but I think it's also time to begin thinking about what might be possible as the existing medical industry reels under the impact of its own self-inflicted injuries. So it's time for another open post. The rules are the same as before:
1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.
2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.
3. If you plan on using rent-a-troll derailing or disruption tactics, please go away. I'm quite familiar with the standard tactics used by troll farms to disrupt online forums, and am ready, willing, and able -- and in fact quite eager -- to ban people permanently for engaging in them here. Oh, and I also lurk on other Covid-19 vaccine skeptic blogs, so I'm likely to notice when the same posts are showing up on more than one venue.
4. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.
With that said, the floor is open for discussion.
Re: New Seneff Papers
https://www.nature.com/articles/s42255-022-00587-9
The article is actually about appetite differences between men and women and exposure to sunlight, but it does contain a lot of information about up regulating p53 in both from exposure to sunlight. The same p53 that is damaged by the spike protein.
So, if you are worried about your exposure to the spike from viruses or vaxxes then get some sun.
Re: New Seneff Papers
Another additional discussion here: https://www.doctorslounge.com/dermatology/news/suntan_p53.shtml
Basically it suggests some sun exposure is actually of benefit overall, especially when it leads to a gradual build up of tan but not burn. p53 is central in this.
I have increased my sun exposure ever since getting an MS diagnosis. I tend to start early in the season (March) and build it up gradually, never with more than 10-25 mins of back, chest plus limbs exposure. I maybe get this a couple of times a week. Anyway, its worked for me - still fully mobile. It does also appear this p53 increases on sunlight hitting skin and helps protects it from UV damage - I guess a useful by product of this occurence is it gets around the rest of the body more too.
Another case of all things in moderation and this appears to be a case of nature turning a potential negative situation (UV damage) into an opportunity for a positive (using it as a cue for additional protections - especially as back in the hunter/gatherer days sun exposure was always going to happen - we need to remember our recent ancestry).