If Pfizer has a comprehensive data set from the trials and they know where all the bodies are buried, so to speak, then they would have known about the decline in efficacy before the 1st EUA. They might have still pushed it hoping for revenue from boosters. But, if they knew about the increase in all cause mortality then they would have to know what a dangerous position they were putting themselves in. If they knew that their vax was ineffective and extremely dangerous before EAU, and much more so for 6 months to 5 years EUA, then they would know they were putting themselves in the metaphorical crosshairs for financial and legal ruin. Possibly even literal crosshairs.
The CDC didn't fund Wuhan, develope or approve the vaccines, or block early treatments. They did (still are) suppressing the data that we need on a number of fronts. They promised to run the PPR tests on the VAERS data and never did. I can understand if they were trying to spin things in a positive light to avoid vaccine hesitancy in the beginning, but as more data comes out the position becomes untenable to hold in good faith. Especially if you assume that they knew the real numbers that died from covid vs with covid.
If the CDC has good data across the board then their actions so far become very difficult to explain without some very novel theories like the demon hypothesis, James Bond supervillains, or the collective unconscious going insane.
Re: A presumption of honesty in a room full of liars
If Pfizer has a comprehensive data set from the trials and they know where all the bodies are buried, so to speak, then they would have known about the decline in efficacy before the 1st EUA. They might have still pushed it hoping for revenue from boosters. But, if they knew about the increase in all cause mortality then they would have to know what a dangerous position they were putting themselves in. If they knew that their vax was ineffective and extremely dangerous before EAU, and much more so for 6 months to 5 years EUA, then they would know they were putting themselves in the metaphorical crosshairs for financial and legal ruin. Possibly even literal crosshairs.
The CDC didn't fund Wuhan, develope or approve the vaccines, or block early treatments. They did (still are) suppressing the data that we need on a number of fronts. They promised to run the PPR tests on the VAERS data and never did. I can understand if they were trying to spin things in a positive light to avoid vaccine hesitancy in the beginning, but as more data comes out the position becomes untenable to hold in good faith. Especially if you assume that they knew the real numbers that died from covid vs with covid.
If the CDC has good data across the board then their actions so far become very difficult to explain without some very novel theories like the demon hypothesis, James Bond supervillains, or the collective unconscious going insane.