The idea of walking away becoming a greater cost than doubling down after first accepting the deal is one thing that has got me fearful. I can see a situation where the unvaxxed go through the usual culling but survive for the most part, the continuously vaxxed survive through repeated poking until those pokes no longer work (or the vaccines can no longer be made), and those of us who stop after a couple pokes (or at any point afterwards) die much sooner than the other two groups – either as a group or to the man/woman.

This wouldn't be the first time we've seen effects from a disease or action develop years after the immediate event (or start of said event). Measles starts a three year period where the body RELEARNS how to defend itself from diseases, smoking and drinking at a steady pace can have effects decades after the habit starts, and starvation can lead to obesity TWO GENERATIONS afterwards (with no effects before the second generation develops). The difference here being that, instead of the disease itself causing the long-term issue (and don't be surprised if some of that happens as well) there's issues from the mRNA vaccine that only further vaccination can keep at bay.

– Donald Hargraves

And, as of right now, I'm not sure we know what those issues are. WE know about the more immediate issues with the vaccine (brain fog, deviant clotting actions – both of which are shared with the virus), what we don't know is what the mRNA viruses they injected us with do over time.