ecosophia | Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 5

The semi-open posts I've hosted here on the Covid-19 narrative, the inadequately tested experimental drugs for it, and the whole cascading mess surrounding them have continued to field a huge number of comments, so I'm opening another space for discussion. The rules are the same as before:

1. If you plan on parroting the party line of the medical industry and its paid shills, please go away. This is a place for people to talk openly, honestly, and freely about their concerns that the party line in question is dangerously flawed and that actions being pushed by the medical industry et al. are causing injury and death. It is not a place for you to dismiss those concerns. Anyone who wants to hear the official story and the arguments in favor of it can find those on hundreds of thousands of websites.

2. If you plan on insisting that the current situation is the result of a deliberate plot by some villainous group of people or other, please go away. There are tens of thousands of websites currently rehashing various conspiracy theories about the Covid-19 outbreak and the vaccines. This is not one of them. What we're exploring is the likelihood that what's going on is the product of the same arrogance, incompetence, and corruption that the medical industry and its tame politicians have displayed so abundantly in recent decades. That possibility deserves a space of its own for discussion, and that's what we're doing here.

3. If you don't believe in treating people with common courtesy, please go away. I have, and enforce, a strict courtesy policy on my blogs and online forums, and this is no exception. The sort of schoolyard bullying that takes place on so many other internet forums will get you deleted and banned here. No, I don't care if you disagree with that: my journal, my rules.

With that said, the floor is open for discussion.

Flat | Top-Level Comments Only

I had a very creepy thought, a further hypothesis:

1) The Covid hysteria in the form we saw would have been almost impossible without the internet as it exists now, and seems to have been mediated quite strongly through it.

2) A lot of people have pushed the idea of the internet being a good thing in all places and contexts under all circumstances a lot further than makes any kind of sense. This has been especially true since the mid 2000s.

3) A lot of people seem to find that the internet is demonic in various ways, especially where it relates to social media.

4) Given the extremely centralized nature of the internet and internet regulation, it wouldn't be too hard for a demonic entity to push the internet to develop in a particular direction; merely by influencing a relatively small number of people.

6) In many ways it was the rise of social media that set the stage for much of the insanity; as well as the insanity around TDS. The first real social media company, Myspace, appeared out of nowhere, lasted as a major force for 7 years, before it started to lose influence and fade away. This would fit the 7 years of benefit traditionally ascribed to selling your soul.

7) In 2010 around a dozen people who worked on Myspace from the beginning died under very strange circumstances. I don't know if there was news on this, since there was a lot of effort made to hide this, but it freaked out a lot of us working there; this would also fit the dragged screaming offstage when those 7 years are up.

8) A lot of people who worked at Myspace from 2003-2010 (including myself), the period when it was founded through to when it began to lose influence, experienced incredibly awful working conditions and more than one of my former colleagues has said that if they were sent to hell, they wouldn't be surprised if it meant going back to working there. This could be any number of things, but in light of the above suggests intense demonic activities.

9) Programmers tend to be disproportionately atheists, and in 2003, when these programmers would have sold their souls based on the above, the New Atheist Movement was going strong; and I've seen lots of evidence that people in that group will call upon demons and make deals for their souls solely to prove they don't believe in any of it.

10) All of which suggests that the modern internet was created by demons, using a group of programmers who sold their soul in 2003, probably for wealth and influence; which could suggest that these demonic forces were planning this attack for quite a while...

If the bloated internet we know today was created by demons in order to pursue a single goal, I wonder if now that it's been achieved they'd move on to other things; in which case given just how much needs to be constantly funneled to it, the internet could rather suddenly come crashing down to a more reasonable size. This could actually even be used to torture the people they trapped with the Covid hysteria: imagine how hard it would be to isolate yourself if large parts of the corporate internet went away....

This could explain why social media seems like it was designed to increase partisanship: if the demons behind it knew they wanted to get people in the managerial class to sell their souls later, they'd need to ramp up the partisanship to absurd levels in advance. No one who's thinking clearly would ever sell their soul merely to get rid of a president: only people who are already rabidly partisan would even consider it...

In that case the way that the "corporate internet is pure good" narrative suddenly started cracking shortly after Trump's victory could be because they were moving on to other things...

You might find this post by SJ Kerrigan about John C. Lilly and the Solid State Entity of interest. http://seankerrigan.com/john-c-lilly-and-the-solid-state-entity/

Another rabbit hole to wander down as far as the Internet's origins goes, is to start reading up on Jacques Vallee and his books.

Umber Intoxicated Lorax

Excellent list, I would have to that list the AI technology, AI is most dangerous to this things since it is the easiest to push with the most impact, you just control the one who works and the training set.
As most of dystopias are happening now I think and AI is going under the radar pretty well.

(Need to make a molecule? Ask this AI for instructions)
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-03977-w

What do you think do they employ this in virology and making artificial proteins with certain name of a dog from Tom&Jerry, take a guess?

Can they feed all the viruses and data to AI, take a guess?

The most probable thing for an AI is to be possessed by a daemon because it lacks the hearth and they work alike just that the daemon is better and older. People sensed this that's why all the stories about AI are like this:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AI_takeover

AI lack self awareness and from that humor and a hearth and that's why they are very dangerous
https://www.theverge.com/2016/3/24/11297050/tay-microsoft-chatbot-racist

AI controls now:
- social media,
- search results,
- social credits,
-etc

Internet was ugly since the corporate took over in early 2000s but since the advent of AI is strongly weaponized.

I remember reading somewhere that a lot of AI researchers started their careers at Myspace, but sadly I can't remember where. If it's true, then hmm...

Mentioning the fact that much of the virus hysteria was formed around dubious modelling seems worth while in regards to this point...

Open (More or Less) Post on Covid 5

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject

no subject