The field today seems to have a mix of sincere researchers, crackpots, and charlatans.
Once again, electronics tinkerers could readily experiment using "software defined radios." These are exactly what the name implies: use of software to select frequencies that are broadcast, usually at low levels. So much easier and more portable than wiring up the right collection of vacuum tubes!
Hulda Clark and her "zapper" might be worth adding to this series. I don't know if she originally came up with the idea or just popularized it. There are others now making "zappers" as complete products, and also as kits and plans.
The "zapper" is a small box that makes pulses of current which go to two metal rods, one held in each hand so that the patterns of current go through the body. A nine volt battery is used to power a typical model. Some have a USB port to download new patterns.
The patterns, whether generated by hardware or software, are allegedly set to the resonant frequencies of infectious bacteria and viruses. The premise is that the presence of the electrical current traveling through the body at these frequencies induces shattering of the toxic micro-organisms. This renders the bugs into harmless debris for the immune system to sweep up. The use of these frequencies is said to be harmless to healthy cells, which resonate at a different range of frequencies.
As an Anon posted, there are people who have developed the "match the resonant frequency" idea into a diagnostic tool. I think software-defined radio could be quite valuable here, with the output going into the patient rather than broadcast into the air.
Clark's haughty book claimed that people with cancer were always totally cured by her system, which also included some nutrition elements, and that all other treatments and cures were bogus. She did not provide medical documentation that the patients had cancer or that they were cured. Some people who actually did have cancerous tumors believed her, discarded all other treatments, and died terribly. If I remember right, she was one of many American medical inventors who relocated to Mexico so she could continue to sell services not approved by the U.S. medical establishment and government.
Another interesting character in this same nonfiction plot line is Ryke Hammer with his "German New Medicine." That's enough of a lead for readers to find out more on the their own.
I believe there are some important medical science findings along these themes, that need further hype-free investigation. I find it easy to suppose that there are entrenched chemistry-based interests that actively fight against anything along these lines.
JMG, I again thank you for the series. I hope you include some discussion of 5G.
no subject
Once again, electronics tinkerers could readily experiment using "software defined radios." These are exactly what the name implies: use of software to select frequencies that are broadcast, usually at low levels. So much easier and more portable than wiring up the right collection of vacuum tubes!
Hulda Clark and her "zapper" might be worth adding to this series. I don't know if she originally came up with the idea or just popularized it. There are others now making "zappers" as complete products, and also as kits and plans.
The "zapper" is a small box that makes pulses of current which go to two metal rods, one held in each hand so that the patterns of current go through the body. A nine volt battery is used to power a typical model. Some have a USB port to download new patterns.
The patterns, whether generated by hardware or software, are allegedly set to the resonant frequencies of infectious bacteria and viruses. The premise is that the presence of the electrical current traveling through the body at these frequencies induces shattering of the toxic micro-organisms. This renders the bugs into harmless debris for the immune system to sweep up. The use of these frequencies is said to be harmless to healthy cells, which resonate at a different range of frequencies.
As an Anon posted, there are people who have developed the "match the resonant frequency" idea into a diagnostic tool. I think software-defined radio could be quite valuable here, with the output going into the patient rather than broadcast into the air.
Clark's haughty book claimed that people with cancer were always totally cured by her system, which also included some nutrition elements, and that all other treatments and cures were bogus. She did not provide medical documentation that the patients had cancer or that they were cured. Some people who actually did have cancerous tumors believed her, discarded all other treatments, and died terribly. If I remember right, she was one of many American medical inventors who relocated to Mexico so she could continue to sell services not approved by the U.S. medical establishment and government.
Another interesting character in this same nonfiction plot line is Ryke Hammer with his "German New Medicine." That's enough of a lead for readers to find out more on the their own.
I believe there are some important medical science findings along these themes, that need further hype-free investigation. I find it easy to suppose that there are entrenched chemistry-based interests that actively fight against anything along these lines.
JMG, I again thank you for the series. I hope you include some discussion of 5G.
Mr. New-Writer